[tkp ts ] 18, medal secretary, please call the roll. Thank you, madame chair, item 1 roll call, commissioner respond when i call your name. Ellington . Present. [ inaudible ] here. Madame chair johnson . Here. All members of the commission are present, the next order of business is item 2. Announcements. A, the next scheduled Commission Meeting will be a regular meeting held on tuesday, may 6th, 2014 at 1 00 p. M. City hall room 416. Please be advised that the ringing and cuss of cell phones, pagers and similar soundproducing devices are prohibited. C, Public Comments please be advised a member of the public has up to 3 minutes to make pertinent Public Comment obvious each agenda item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter period on any item. Its strongly recommended that members of the public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card provided by the Commission Secretary and submit the completed card to the submission secretary. Next order of business is item 3, report
I guess generally speaking i want to start with a couple of things about ucsfs mission and how they interplay with development. I think in theory i get it, when we talk about the springback provisions, and the sort of maintenance of the property for the mission of ucsf. But it starts to get a little bit fuzzy for me, when i was reading when would be the line over which we would determine that a use for the property wasnt part of ucsfs Educational Mission . They are such a Large Institution and do so many things that there are many potential educational uses that someone from the outside could look and say that is actually a business, or some other type of entity. And so i guess i know that the plan hasnt been hatched yet for what the space will be used for, but i was wondering if someone could talk you alittle bit about what are the bounds on what an Educational Mission use look like. Christian maher development specialist. If you dont mind, i would like lara yamyoshi would be better a
These obligations primarily include annual payments in lieu of taxes, our standard Design Review and design approval procedures and contracting local hire and workforce programs. The release has the potential to reduce the amount of tax increment generated in the south plan area, which would thereby negatively impact ocis ability to meet its Affordable Housing and infrastructure obligations in the south area. So to avoid these potential impacts ocii has negotiated the memorandum of understanding, as well as related agreements as a condition to granting release from these obligations. Now i will walk through the agreements that are before you for consideration this afternoon. The first of these is the mou between ocii and the uc regents. The mou contains the terms under which ocii would release uc from certain obligations under the south plan, the opa and the pilot agreement. Some of the key terms of the mou first, the Affordable Housing payment. This is a onetime lumpsum payment from u
Ucsf and the documents that govern development of the site, followed by discussion of the main terms of the proposed agreements; the findings of benefits that we are required to make under redevelopment law, Environmental Review and conclusion and next steps. Blocks 33 and 34 as director bohee mention ready currently owned by an affiliate of salesforce. Com and comprise 3. 8 acre sites. As you can see it here on the map bonded by 16th street to the north, illinois to the east, mariposa to the south and 3rd to the west. This allows for wide variety of uses including office, retail, laboratory and manufacturing. Medical clinicks are permitted as a secondary use if certain criteria are met. Blocks 33 and 34 are subject to a pilot agreement, which was recorded against the property in 2010 by fockil. Excuse me, christine can you make sure to speak into the microphone. Sure. Thanks. The purpose of the second opa amendment was to prohibit the transfer in Mission Bay South of property to a tax
I want to advocate that youre not doing a good job but im advocating that the Community Must be involved. Must be involved were the impacted community. We got nothing out of this. We got nothing. And being the impacted community ive listened to everyone that came up here and boy they soft shutd a lot of hard questions in terms of participation, decisions that be made behind the voucher system and everything it is something that their need to be more sensitivity on the Mayors Office of housing, it sound as if youre staff is dictating to you instead of you dictating to your staff i think this is your staff and their dictating to you yes. You listen to them its all right to listen to them by be wise and smart enough to ask the hard questions and get the right answers instead of it being soft shutd bach balk to you where them they will not give you a commitment that gives them more power once the project gets implemented because i dont know what theyre going to do. Ive seen western edition