vietnam wants to come before people that break down with it, but i think that his testimony was quite credible when he believed it was mr. zimmerman. doris singleton and, by the way, chris serino both say the same thing. unfortunately, when mr. martin did first hear the tape, he said what he believed to be true then, it would seem, from the officers. and that is that s not my son s voice. it just wasn t his voice to him. and his mind has changed now. but it is interesting for you to consider when you re trying to figure out that issue of who said what and what witnesses said what. because you re going to give them credibility, you re going to weigh them, you re going to decide to dismiss their testimony or to accept their testimony and figure out remember always awz we ll talk about in a moment, where the
the big picture is what happened. and it s supported by [inaudible] you know, we talked a moment ago about ignoring george, but you know what? listen to him. find inconsistencies, take into context of what he was going through that night and how voluntarily he gave all of those statements and decide whether or not as dennis root said, as chris spend serino said, as i believe singleton said, if anyone is giving the same exact story twice, they re probably lying. they re probably pathological liars. because when you lie, i guess since you re making up a
fantasy, you can tell the fantasy twice the same exact way. but if you get your nose smashed and your head smashed and you answer every question they ask of you, then, yeah, okay, deal with the inconsistencies however you want to. but maybe i would suggest if you can by dealing with them the way chris serino did since it was his case. and be what he said to you was, yeah, there was inconsistency. he said i got hit 25 times. ah, i don t believe it. it seems he didn t hit you 25 times. did it feel like he was getting hit 25 times? maybe. is that the embellishment, the exaggeration the state is talking about when they say to you, uh-oh, he s exaggerating, he s a liar.