comment, most of the supporting the cruise ship terminal, so i would like to defer to our legal counsel on the last comment that was made, just to let us know that it is ok to move forward or not. we do believe it is a party to move forward at this point in time. yes. commissioner brandon: thank you. i had the pleasure of serving on the commission with commissioner jimmy herman, and he was such a wonderful person. so to ditto some of the public comment on this is a great day in port history, in that we re finally, i hope, putting a shovel in the ground and building a new cruise terminal. this is my second opportunity on building a new cruise terminal, but i feel really good about this one. [laughs] i want to echo my fellow commissioners and applaud director moyer and the staff for bringing this item to assign such a short time span. it is a great item. without saying anything else, all in favor? resolutions 1175, 1176, 1177, and 1178 have been approved. [applause] [cheers a
jimmy herman, and he was such a wonderful person. so to ditto some of the public comment on this is a great day in port history, in that we re finally, i hope, putting a shovel in the ground and building a new cruise terminal. this is my second opportunity on building a new cruise terminal, but i feel really good about this one. [laughs] i want to echo my fellow commissioners and applaud director moyer and the staff for bringing this item to assign such a short time span. it is a great item. without saying anything else, all in favor? resolutions 1175, 1176, 1177, and 1178 have been approved. [applause] [cheers and applause] commissioner brandon: thank you so much. i would like to request a short recess, hopefully 10 minutes. commissioners, the title for item 9b has been revised. all located along the embarcadero waterfront, located along the north side of islet creek. request development of this position agreement and related actions to implement the 34th america s cup pro
with fellow city departments, was clearly the right one. so on words and upwards. i think we should all ditto that statement. [laughter] we have heard a lot of public comment, most of the supporting the cruise ship terminal, so i would like to defer to our legal counsel on the last comment that was made, just to let us know that it is ok to move forward or not. we do believe it is a party to move forward at this point in time. yes. commissioner brandon: thank you. i had the pleasure of serving on the commission with commissioner jimmy herman, and he was such a wonderful person. so to ditto some of the public comment on this is a great day in port history, in that we re finally, i hope, putting a shovel in the ground and building a new cruise terminal. this is my second opportunity on building a new cruise terminal, but i feel really good about this one. [laughs] i want to echo my fellow commissioners and applaud director moyer and the staff for bringing this item to ass
commissioners, the title for item 9b has been revised. all located along the embarcadero waterfront, located along the north side of islet creek. request development of this position agreement and related actions to implement the 34th america s cup project of, involving use of peers and adjacent water areas, water basins between peers 32 and 38, 14 and 22.5, all located along the embarcadero waterfront, seawall lot 330, and a portion of peer 80, located along the north side of islais creek, east of illinois street. good afternoon, commissioners. special projects manager here representing the very large port and city team who has been working on this project for the last year. we are very grateful to be here today after a lot of long nights. it really has been an amazing experience. including last night s experience at the planning commission for the certification of the eir. the work that planning staff did on that environmental impact report was truly incredible. we
neighborhood. we really need to think of it as a whole. the of the parking lots and the historic area. how do we bring that together? i think this is a good first step in addressing that. commissioner fong here will give you some expert advice. it will try to make this a plan that the city can move forward and support. i would like to commend them for the excellent vision plan to have put before you. they re deeply experienced and they know what they re doing. it is very thoughtful inappropriate except in one particular instance. i would say that in spite of all the grand pronouncements and the dramatic visuals, what is before you is really about a couple very simple land-use questions. should the law be preserved as a surface parking lot? and the second question is, should the city of san francisco realize the value of this extraordinary land? or should the city provided economic subsidy for neighbors who oppose the lot for being used for anything other than a surface park