Way, with your tax dollars, joe biden speechwriters use rhetoric like that because ever since Donald Trumps election, its been effective, scare a lot of people. But now that democrats hav erace embraced totalitarianism, now that theyre arresting their chieheyrefd political opponents, their rivals, several of his advisors, does the rhetorirsc actually work . . Still in twenty , twenty three , how Doresp Americans respond to Author Authoritarianism who pretend to be fightingonou get i authoritarianism . Do you get it . Ift . You i f you get a moment, look go on youtube like i did todayth and take a look at some ofts the comments on joe biden speech, the video from yesterday, theyre all negative, honestly. Versome of them are very funny. For example, heres one. Its nice that he was able to have a every Single Person that ever showed up at one of his rallies all fit intoe vide a three minute video, said one viewer, another quote, quote,tn i wish youtube would turnha back the dislike vote c
way, with your tax dollars, joe biden speechwriters use rhetoric like that because ever since donald trump s election, it s been effective, scare a lot of people. but now that democrats hav erace embraced totalitarianism, now that they re arresting their chiehey refd political opponents, their rivals, several of his advisors, does the rhetorirsc actually work? ? still in twenty , twenty three , how doresp americans respond to author authoritarianism who pretend to be fightingonou get i authoritarianism? do you get it? ift? you i f you get a moment, look go on youtube like i did todayth and take a look at some ofts the comments on joe biden speech, the video from yesterday, they re all negative, honestly. versome of them are very funny. for example, here s one . it s nice that he was able to have a every single person that ever showed up at one of his rallies all fit intoe vide a three minute video, said one viewer, another quote, quote,tn i wish youtube would turnha back the
to be one of his signaturee legislative achievements. the passage of the chip ons. t so let s break it down. it includes hundreds of billions of dollars for research into semiconductors. seems goodolla, whicrsh is impot if you want electronics to be the future and if you want electronics to work, at leastico that sre how the chips act was e built. bring the chips home. act now, in reality, chips act is yet another vehicle fore bide the bush administration s equity agenda. administhere s how the biden administration s own website descrdescribes one . the bill s key provisions, quote, women in construction wanted applicants for chips funding will be asked to take action to conduct outreach to and retain women in construction jobs because the united states cannot build the semiconductor workforce it needs without them. l th so, in other words, a bill suppe semiconductors is about fundin semiconductor is really about funding people on the basis ofde their gender. we want womer.n. it s soci
The Commerce Department’s proposed guidelines say firms can’t use the funds for projects outside the US or to build semiconductor manufacturing facilities in ‘foreign entities of concern’.
that, jacqui, that those permits were issued by previous administrations, not by his. a portion from biden but a lot of them from the trump steve: one other quick question for you. he is going to michigan today to one of these plants that manufactures chip waivers. wafers that semiconductors are made from. going to take a victory lap over the passage of the chips act which was bipartisan. did any of those billions and billions of dollars go to this plant? no. so, the chips funding has not been allocated yet. this is a private company that is pledging an investment similar to what we saw a couple months ago in ohio with intel. they pledged money to bolster their operation really probably hoping to get some of these chips dollars. but the president s aim here is to talk about how your tax dollars will also fuel private investment and this company produces chips that would go into electric vehicles. expect him to probably talk