years ago. yesterday the court considered claims that google allowed isis to post hundreds of videos online aimed at inciting violence and algorithms helped isis recruit efforts along the way. the audio of some of those deliberations inside the high court. the thumb nails is based upon what the all going if if the videos don t appear out of thin air. they must be targeted to something. dana: more on all this we re live in washington. david spunt. it s getting underway right now. yesterday justice kagan asked the question to laughter in the courtroom should these nine justices be wading into the waters saying they may not be the best people to understand the internet. today s case focused on liability. can twitter be held liable by the families of terror victims. the second big case involving big tech before the court this week. family of a man killed in an isis attack in turkey in 2017 sued twitter, google and facebook arguing the platforms posted terrorist videos o
arm s length distance for quite a while. remember putin said he thought they were best friends and it turned out actually china wasn t so enamored and wasn t going to fully support and they were agas at the attacks on civilians and now they are there today, his foreign minister, the chinese foreign minister in russia talking to putin and working out a summit between putin and xi. what has changed in the chinese president s mind to make him think this is a good move now? here is what we need to remember. putin and xi are dictators and they are expansionists. the desire of president xi to take over taiwan and other areas in the western pacific has not changed. the best way to stop him is for putin to lose his war of aggression in ukraine and that is absolutely possible this year