with the bare minimum requirements that they are required to follow and jamie has explained this to me, everything ivanka is doing is technically legal. i think people have been a little startled to learn just tt exactly you can get away with when you are in the white house. no one has tested the policy this way. yes, she can technically maintain ownership of the company, even though she s placed these family members in charge of the trust that are making the business decisions and she only needs to recuse herself on an individual case-by-case basis if a particular policy matter might affect her business. she does not need to step away from all china trade policy, for example. i think it s been a little shocking to people that that s allowed. could this in a broader sense be why president trump remains below 40% in approval? could it be that americans are saying, don t make a fool of me here. whether it s ivanka in this case
policies. they want tax reform enacted, they want to do something about health care and trump hasn t delivered anything. and he s all over the map with it. but what policies? that s what i m saying. two minutes ago china was a currency manipulator and now they re not. so what policies does this administration represent? bingo. so if you tie yourself to trump the man as a republican, you re going to get burned. and that s why you re seeing joni ernst and james langford and politicians beginning to separate themselves from trump the man and focus on the policies. it s not going to be easy, stephanie. i m telling you. trump just likes you to keep calling him the man. the fact of the matter is the man is the policy. that s what he sold us on. no. he said throughout this campaign, look, i am the guy. i m not a politician. i m going to drain the swamp. trust me, i know business. so he can t say, oh, take policy trump and not take personal trump. both are problematic and this
now is not only from the arab world but what s happening between iran and israel and the debate ongoing. we got this piece of sound. let me show this to you first. i believe that the key to policy in the middle east is whether or not iran is going to have a nuclear weapon, and iran is not far way from having a nuclear weapon. the prime minister of israel says he believes they will have that capability relatively soon. that s the most serious foreign policy national security threat america faces, is a nuclear iran. unfortunately, we re four years closer to that than when he took office. what s your reaction? ridiculous. first of all, i m listening to people like, you know, martin dempsey who is the joint chief for the united states. he says that we need to have a policy where we are being deliberate, we re engaging on issues of sanctions, but also in the area of diplomacy. he says that a war would not be
a teenager charged in a bar bombing plot is do you in a chicago kourts this afternoon. they arrested him on friday after a lengthy sting operation. it happened after they gave him a phony car bomb and watched him try to blow it up. they say the teen was inspired by osama bin laden to carry out killings on a mass scale. coming up, china crackdown. the white house hits china with an auto trade complaint. first read says it s good politics, but is it good policy? another magazine publishes topless photos of the duchess of cambridge as the royal family takes legal action. you ll find behind the scene pictures at newsnation.tumbl newsnation.tumbler.com. now from the maker of splenda sweeteners, discover nectresse. the only 100% natural, no-calorie sweetener made from the goodness of fruit. the rich, sweet taste of sugar. nothing artificial.
china a currency manipulator, and that will fix everything. number one, it ignores the fact that china that there have been technological improvements in the united states. that we ve had an economic downturn. that automation has occurred, and that china is growing rapidly. that is the majority of the reason for these changes. second, we see you know, it s interesting here that you bring up these issues, steve, because who would think we d talk about chindz trade policy. it would be economy, economy, economy in the united states specifically. is this, then, an old scare tactic that some critics say the way romney is approaching this it issue of china trade policy? he s certainly seeking to demonize china, and it s bad politics and bad policy. i don t think it s going it to resonate with people. i don t think it s a credible argument these job losses have all been to china. declaring them a currency