some of the biggest, most influential countries in the world chose to abstain and i m not thinking just of china itself, but india, pakistan, south africa? if you in taiwan want to convince yourselves that the international community does respect rules and does value democracy, maybe that vote was a bit of a disappointment? yes, i understand your concerns, but i think what we are now witnessing is a kind of competition between two different groups. one is democracy and the other is autocracy and after russia s invasion of ukraine, the competition between these two groups of countries will reach a new high in the future, and what we are concerned is that russia and china has announced that they will deepen their strategic partnership with each other and, as you mentioned earlier, they say their partnership will have no boundaries, will have no limits, so that is something that we witness on the side
withdrawal of russian forces from all ukrainian territory, some of the biggest, most influential countries in the world chose to abstain and are not thinking just of china itself, but india, pakistan, south africa, interview in taiwan want to convince yourselves that the international community does respect rules and does value democracy, may that vote was a bit of a disappointment? yes, i understand your concerns but i think what we are witnessing is a kind of competition between two different groups, one is the democracy and the other is autocracy, and after russia s invasion of ukraine, the competition between these two groups will be to new high in the future, and we are concerned that russia and china has announced that they will deepen their strategic partnership with the tire, and as you mentioned earlier, their partnership will have no boundaries, no limits, so that
on the world stage, for example, if you don t understand the types of things these documents talk about. access to rare earth minerals, how climate change will actually affect china itself, right? in terms of sea level rise on the coast there. de desertfication in central parts there. you need to understand that or otherwise you ll make wrong choices. we only have about 30 seconds here, erin, but obviously the president going into a very high-stakes climate summit here in the next couple of weeks. how important will those discussions be and should national security be part of those conversations? those discussions are critical and national security has to be a part of it. our research in these reports show that if we don t cut emissions in the second half of the century, the climate impacts are catastrophic to security. so cutting emissions is absolutely critical. and these documents help make the case. it s not just the scientists.
N-JOY Weltweit n-joy.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from n-joy.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
we want agreement with the united states and we want to progress those discussions but if it is not a priority discussions but if it is not a priority for the biden administration at the moment, then that is administration at the moment, then that is the administration at the moment, then that is the position that we understand. that is the position that we understand. ,,., ., ,, ., that is the position that we understand. ,. ., ,, . ., understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of a understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of a way understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of a way off, it understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of a way off, it is - understand. saw a us uk trade deal was a bit of a way off, it is still - was a bit of a way off, it is still a bit of a way off so it will be disappointing to people who voted for brexit thinking a benefit would be a quick deal with the united states. meanwhile t