Good afternoon, everyone, this meeting will come to order. Welcome to the december 6th, 2017 regular meeting of the rules committee. Im chair of the committee to my right is vicechair supervisor sandy lee fewer and to my left is Rule Committee members. Our clerk today is alicia and madam clerk, do you have any announcements today . Silence all cellphones and Electronics Devices and copies of any documents to be include firstdegree as part of the file and items acted on will be on december 12th agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you, madam. Are there any initial comments please call item number 1. Item number 1 is an ordinance amending the administrative code to reauthorize the San Francisco Sentencing Commission and extend the date to june 30th , 2020. Unless theres comments from my colleagues id like to call brittney forward. Please proceed. Good afternoon chair and Committee Members. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to talk with you today and my name is brittney from the off
Coordinating on these issues through not only the planned area but the studies, on funding. Regional measure three thank you for helping us get that authorized at the state level. This will come in january in order to make it on the ballot in march and be presented to the voters in june. We were happy poinclude the public engagement. We have been partner with city for local hire type strategies, and importantly rede nine the communitys concern to make sure we reflect the communitys needs who are already very hard to bring to the floor because of the nature of documenting some of these. We were proud to get the definition more correct here in San Francisco. That will be used throughout the region as well. We have been advancing our late night transportation study and initiatives and internally we have been participating in a Year Learning Program with other agencies around Racial Equity how we can better operationallize that in the hiring and budgeting and planning. That is very eye ope
Appellants request, including removal of roof deck and privacy including nonoperable frosted grass windows and privacy screen. With these modifications added, there is no impact on the privacy to the rear yard of appellants home. This is the sensitively designed, smallscale Development Needed for the west side of town to do its part to address the housing crisis the Planning Commission saw that and unanimously approved it. It meets all criteria of 317 for approval of demolition and replacement. The project was before the Planning Commission because 317 requires conditional approval for demolition. Joe purchased the house in 2015 from the estate of the former owner, who owneroccupied until his death in 2014. Its been vacant since of the Planning Commission found that there was all the relevant data. It is not subject to rent control and no tenants were or are being replaced. It replaces one unit with three and three bedrooms with eight bedrooms. It closely conforms to rm1 zoning and the
Submit. Thank you. Clerk supervisor farrell . Councillor farrell thank you. I want to back up what supervisor cohen just said and supervisor breed. And now acting mayor breed said earlier. One thing i want to share with everyone. People ask us, what is your memory of mayor lee . And i want it share something from last thursday, which is the last time i saw him. We were at the Christmas Tree lighting at mclaren lodge, the official San Francisco Christmas Tree. I went up on stage with him. For the first time, my children came with me on stage for the first time. And my little guy, who just turned 5 years old, he thought that he was going to be the one to flip the switch and turn on the Christmas Tree lights. I told him that was not the case. Thats the mayors job and his prerogative to do so. Apparently the mayor heard me talking to him. And so when the mayor went up, he motioned to my son and they kind of held hands on top of each other and flipped the switch together with a bunch of oth
Our project has been described as massive, monolithic and out of character with its neighbors as an anomaly in an area dominated by smaller buildings. The facts dont bear this out. The diagram indicates in red the 4th stories of a large number of existing buildings in both the contiguous and surrounding blocks. The vast majority of these buildings contain four stories that represent 100 of their overall footprints with no setbacks at all. The appellants 2story building is indicated in yellow and you can see theres a partial 4th floor on the building next door to his building to the east. To the west, the corner building at lake and 27th avenue is 3 stories. But as steve mentioned, its capped by a roof ands that large floortofloor heights bringing the Building Height up to 37 feet. This is 3 feet below our proposed roof line. This is not atypical at all for the block, as many older buildings of 3 stories are in the range of 35 to 37 feet. A proposed 4th level is shown in blue behind the