Feces or urine on our guards, they do lose some movie time watching. When i was down there a couple of times, you know, somebody lost movie privileges because they found out a way to throw urine or feces on guards and there actually was a guard that yelled back at the person that threw feces on him and he ended up being punished, i was told by article 15, because youre not allowed to respond when a terrorist throws feces or urine on you. That they will take care of the adequate punishment and they think its enough to take away some of their movie watching time or Television Watching time. Or maybe take away some of the time they get to be outside playing soccer. They dont need to be in the United States if theyve committed an act of war against the United States and the evidence seems to indicate clearly that this defendant had. And im very pleased and i applaud the administration for finally picking up this guy that was so available to interNational Media. They could get interviews wi
Something that needs to go. Work withbe happy to you on it. Many expertsey, have said that had we left a residual force in iraq, a nato which american troops would have been a part, that would not have been able to make the gains that it made, nor it have had attempted to make those gains. Agree with that . Well, as you recall, senator, we actually recommended, our military advice was that we needed to remain partnered with the Iraqi Security forces longer. And that, so i stand by that recommendation. Ago. Part of it years the size of it was being negotiated, but i was very much needed toe we continue to partner with them. Ourremember that partnership was on the basis of increasing their tactical logistics, their capability, their ability to be a responsible institution of government. Is that thetoday government has not acted responsibly in iraq. And i dont know that the presence of u. S. Military personnel uniquely would have outcome. He but you stand by your initial recommendation th
To you can watch all of this later at our program schedule. We are taking you live now to a hearing getting under way on capitol hill that is ted poe of texas. He chairs one of the subcommittees of house Foreign Affairs, 1 of the 2 looking into the Prisoner Exchange for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl which occurred on may 31st, a former commander of special forces in afghanistan will testify, as will an Army Specialist who served with Sergeant Bergdahl. Lets hope that the bergdahl negotiators are not the same ones currently negotiating with iran over nuclear weapons. Be that as it may, releasing five senior taliban commanders may put the lives of our Senior Service members and americans around the world at risk. 1 of the 5 detainees was deputy chief of the talibans intelligence service. One detainee fought alongside al qaeda, a taliban military general. Another was a Senior Commander wanted by the United Nations for war crimes and worked closely with al qaeda and their affiliates. In fact
Would be a factor. So the greater the rebate, that would be where you would. How many times trades does ameritrade route . We route about 37 of our flow would go to an exchange on a daily basis, so im assuming that ill call it 40 of lets call it 400,000 trades a d day. About 150,000 trades a day . 150,000 trades a day times, you know you want a quarter, right . So thats going to be about lets see well, lets round it off, say half a million a week . Yeah. So make in a month that would be about 2 million. A quarter about 8 million. That sounds good. Round it off. We did about 90 million trades last year. Then why wo it be only 8 million thats no exchanges. And you asked per quarter. Thats about 8 million, two exchanges in a typical quarter. We looked at the form 606 quarterly order routing disclosures for the quarter that was covered in the vitalio paper. Im going to have to go vote. Were going to have to recess here for about 15 minutes to give you all a chance to do Something Else that
Power state. They are all working together. That is the good news. The bad news is, they are completely panicked in how to actually do the plan and how to actually meet the 26 percent mandated a reduction because we are 72 reliant upon cool. So in reaching out to them, they are frustrated with the lack of direction, what they see as conflicting information from the epa on how to move forward, but one of the areas that they would like to have nailed down is the percentages for reductions based on, is it 2012 numbers or 2005 numbers . Where we look to start was the data, most recent, 2012. That is the baseline, 2012 . Why would they be confused . There is not really a baseline. How is there no baseline . Carbon intensity. The reason people are confused because it is a year that people have been using a lot to talk about our progress toward reducing Greenhouse Gas. So in describing the impact of the rule epa has compared reductions achieved in to 2032 the 2005 number. The starting point f