deoccupy and militarize the area around the plant. however, it is not quite clear howe they will go about implementing this plant. it is quite obvious that for the first time in history a war has been brought to this structure. this has not yet happened before, so the situation is unprecedented and it is not clear how the international organizations will respond. the iaea report doesn t say which side is responsible, most responsible to the shelling, for the threats to the plant. cnn has captured images of russian military vehicles inside the grounds of the plant. do we know who bears chief responsibility here? is itst correct to say that both sides are endangering the plant?
MSCI appoints global head of ESG and climate indexes
opalesque.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from opalesque.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
yes, if he did collude to dig up dirt on a political rival, that would be an impeachable offense that merits an immediate sponsor at least a full investigation. and a full impeachment proceeding is the thing that would warrant a full investigation and that would get the democrats to sort of underlying evidence that they have been seeking. now, one of the other big impediments to this impeachment issue has been the front line democrats who won districts in 2018 that president trump won back in 2016. and nancy pelosi s chief responsibility really is to keep her majority intact and so the concern was is this impeachment question really does it run counter to the political interests of those members. and now we ve seen those members themselves throw off that reluctance in an op-ed. it says we believe these actions represent an impeachable offense, we call on our colleagues in congress to are consider the use of all
lawmaker slamming nielsen in border security in a rant that turned religion. pete: here with his reaction fox news contributor pastor robert jeffress. help us out here. [laughter] pete: we laugh and we do, but, he was trying to make what he thought was a serious point that jesus would have never been born had there been a wall. look, his comments were ludicrous for so many reasons but let me just mention two. first of all, the bible says it was god through an angel who told joseph and the family to flee to egypt. and i will guarantee you had there been a wall in egypt god would have obliterated it or he would have sent the family some place else. god wasn t about to let his son be murdered prematurely before his appointed time on the cross. also jesus when he was adult said render unto sever see caese things that are caesar s. chief responsibility is to