a bit fera but again this is not about the small print of political legislation people seemingly looking for that promise of change and hope and they gave him their support almost 3 quarters ukrainians giving him the benefit of the doubt on a big problem number one is are russia what russian has there been from russia to this new president well phil we had quite a response from moscow today. spokesman saying that putin would congratulate selenski only when selenski was able to prove 1st results in terms of improving the situation in the east and improving ukraine s relations russia so very conditional and pretty unconvincing for naturalization response that in his speech solecki said that don t buy us and resolving that conflict would be his chief priority so there s no really getting around russia that given that those separatists are backed by russia and dependent on russia but equally i don t see
shannon: i ll start with you, we have heard from your former boss over the weekend there was opposition or whoever was going to be the judge worried about rolling back row v wade and civil rights and other things. is that an over reaction? no, it is not. if anything it is a reflex of the real stakes at issue. this isn t a political game. real people, their lives are at stake for how this court rules. i thinke you saw that in senatr mansions statements earlier today when he said his chief priority is to the people of westto virginia. it is one of the reasons he will be focused on judge kavanaugh views whether people with reexisting health conditions can behe discriminated against, on e basis of those conditions. the judgements more views broadly on healthcare and the judicial philosophy in how he would look at obama care. we talk about it as a fun game. for people out in america, who are relying on obama care for their health insurance their family health insurance. that s tables st
this is stormy daniels speaking. but the fantastic was in. he really wasn t working as my attorney, he was one of the trump guys. and so my happineshappiness, my livelihood wasn t his chief priority. question two to you is, does this have merit? will this go anywhere? your analysis is spot on. and it raises several different legal issues. keith davidson, obviously. davidson s conduct raises several legal issues as stormy daniels attorney. the first is whether or not he breached his duty of confidentiality, his duty of loyalty that all of us as attorneys owe to our clients. and for which we can be disciplined under the rules of professional conduct. but beyond that, if looking at the four corners of the complaint, which i have here, you look at the actual allegations. and even if they re true, there is question as to whether or not there s ultimately a legal case here. what are the damages? you know, when you described the case so accurately, you said
reporter for the washington post, moderator of washington week on pbs. gentlemen, welcome to you both. counselor, i ll begin with you because you re our lawyer here for the purposes of this conversation. am i getting it right, this lawsuit basically says michael davidson was my attorney. this is stormy daniels speaking. but the fantastic was in. he really wasn t working as my attorney, he was one of the trump guys. and so my happiness, my livelihood wasn t his chief priority. question two to you is, does this have merit? will this go anywhere? your analysis is spot on. and it raises several different legal issues. keith davidson, obviously. yes. davidson s conduct raises several legal issues as stormy daniels attorney. the first is whether or not he breached his duty of confidentiality, his duty of loyalty that all of us as attorneys owe to our clients. and for which we can be
to keep them here. i think that s the key and it s a great success and good to be able to show that his policies are working and this is a clear example for that. and what i was alluding to is we ve seen competition between states forever to give these kinds of handouts to companies. please locate your plant here in tennessee as opposed to across the border in ohio because of labor laws or minimum wage laws. traditionally, the view in the last i mean, for presidency as far back as we can recall, look, as a country, we just can t compete with mexico or vietnam for labor conditions and a lax regulation on the private sector. if trump really does want to make it his chief priority to keep jobs in the u.s. and avoid them going overseas because of trade and not even addressing the issue of automation, you need a blanket policy and we have not heard that from him yet and as with everything that he talked about during the campaign, he has set an exceptionally high bar for himself in terms