people much more distantly connected to terrorism, people who finance terrorism or who give material support who we can hold as enemy combatants as welch well. that s nothing that the supreme court has said, that is not the state of the law. that is something that she said when answering lindsey graham that she believed to be true. and that really is a core preseptember of the bush/cheney approach of the last decade. that s not a perfect insight to what she thinks, but it s a little snippet that ought to be of concern for people who oppose the bush approach to terrorism. former constitutional lawyer himself, glenn greenwald, whose criticism early on of the kagan nomination has been a real focus for people in terms of sorting out her record and what s worthy of discussion about it. glenn, thank you very much for your insight. thanks, rachel. then there is the case in favor of kagan for the supreme court.