That is part of what this vote would be. We dont trust that, it was no way iran could come under it. The consequences of this are even more than what you laid out. Here is what else happens but better on politics long enough, i have a pretty good sense a lot of people were opposing this before it was announced before they read it. If this does not meet congresses approval, and iran goes back to enriching, you can hear the cry now. What are we going to do about it . You hear the Prime Minister of his rail calling me up it is time to bomb. What are we going to do . That is why learned people say that is the alternative. When they are glitching like crazy, and the patched up diplomacy, and passed up the nonproliferation treaty, what is left . I know senators are uncomfortable that they may have an enrichment program, so what is your plan . Knock out their entire capacity . Erase the memory . Totally go to war . I heard somebody mention iraq that we had a huge ability to know what happened
We will be back. I went to see if there are any other Opening Statements and i want to make sure we have plenty of time. Any othe other members Opening Statements introduced in the record without objection will be entered into the record. Let me introduce the witnesses for todays hearing. Doctor tim pearson will lea leaf the panel, the scientist in the Government Accountability office in july, 2008 and as such he is a member of the Senior Executive service of the u. S. Federal government and also serves as a director for the center for Science Technology and engineering. Thank you for being with us today and we look forward to your comments. Also would like to welcome from ththe centers of Disease Control and prevention with 30 years of Public Health and science and Emergency Response in medical Training Experience she now serves as the Deputy Director for the office of Public Health preparedness response thank you for being here. Next steve munro for the laboratory of science and Safe
I went to see if there are any other Opening Statements and i want to make sure we have plenty of time. Any othe other members Opening Statements introduced in the record without objection will be entered into the record. Let me introduce the witnesses for todays hearing. Doctor tim pearson will lea leaf the panel, the scientist in the Government Accountability office in july, 2008 and as such he is a member of the Senior Executive service of the u. S. Federal government and also serves as a director for the center for Science Technology and engineering. Thank you for being with us today and we look forward to your comments. Also would like to welcome from ththe centers of Disease Control and prevention with 30 years of Public Health and science and Emergency Response in medical Training Experience she now serves as the Deputy Director for the office of Public Health preparedness response thank you for being here. Next steve munro for the laboratory of science and Safety Centers for Di
And what it consists of and then how often they view those Staff Assistance and not just for the vba because they are missing positions and the rating offices across the board. There is a lack of resources but its hard to decide where to put the money and where to allocate those resources if theres not a prop proper formula deciding where to Staffing Levels should be and where maybe it might be too much. And my perspective, as long as the vba is able to meet the stated goals for timeliness and accuracy, im very happy for them to decide where those resources are placed when they are unable to it seems they may need some help from either oversight bodies or the vso to work directly with them. I would welcome you and the others that are here to continue to stay in touch with us. We might see deficiencies where we are not meeting our goals when it comes to accuracy and timeliness and we might recommend Additional Resources being placed. I appreciate your perspective on this. I would like t