The latest breaking news, reporting and live coverage of the day s important stories; hosted by trusted NBC News journalists, these dynamic hours offer.
in check put when i try to keep them in check they begin polarizing the constituency i want to talk to the people on the streets and i want an end to this polarization and i want to let the people know where we stand and where we re headed or know if they can fix in. the only problem is that the range is becoming increasingly polarized that s what left party supporters keep telling me this is a video this is small rebellion but it s not a small as we d like it to be. some people irreconcilable if that speech is harsha more vicious and dimwitted. my old hometown seems withdrawn and i fear the stadia lections might make things worse. according to polls the left party with the board over i m a little past the more support but might not succeed in forming a coalition government and since no one wants to work with the a.f.p. the federal state is the drift of a political deadlock which would further deepen the social trenches. sometimes when
and i think that s when you have to look at criminal profiling. are these things being used, whatever it may be, fertilizer or fireworks or anything else. and at the time, if it s being used, i think you ve got to look at that, and that s just being smart, and not infringing on my rights. i can still buy those fireworks. if they said i couldn t buy them, then i would have a problem with it. okay. explain to me then why it is you would be quite happy to have effectively a check put in place on firework purchases and firework purchases, but you re not prepared to have, say, background checks at gun shows or many gun rights people aren t prepared to have that. what is the difference? i didn t well, i didn t advocate for a background check, piers, on fireworks. i didn t say i should have to stand up and get a i.d., first of all, or fill out a piece of paper that goes to the fbi to check my background. that s not what i advocated for. i said if there is suspicious activity. hold on a
unusual amount of fireworks. would you see that as a new infringement on your civil liberties? no, i see that as criminal profiling. i mean, if you have people that are acting awkward and they re trying to buy fertilizer, for example, i would want someone to make a phone call and say you might want to check this out. the same way when you have someone acting odd buying an abnormal amount of fireworks and not with a bunch of kids around him around the holidays of 4th of july or new years or not for like a wedding celebration. that should stick out to people and i think that s when you have to look at criminal profiling. are these things being used, whatever it may be, fertilizer or fireworks or anything else. and at the time, if it s being used, i think you ve got to look at that, and that s just being smart, and not infringing on my rights. i can still buy those fireworks. if they said i couldn t buy them, then i would have a problem with it. okay. explain to me then why it is you
rights. i can still buy those fireworks. if they said i couldn t buy them, then i would have a problem with it. okay. explain to me then why it is you would be quite happy to have effectively a check put in place on firework purchases and firework purchases, but you re not prepared to have, say, background checks at gun shows or many gun rights people aren t prepared to have that. what is the difference? i didn t well, i didn t advocate for a background check, piers, on fireworks. i didn t say i should have to stand up and get a i.d., first of all, or fill out a piece of paper that goes to the fbi to check my background. that s not what i advocated for. i said if there is suspicious activity. hold on a second. if there is suspicious activity. what about when somebody that s different than a background check. no. what about if somebody a bit suspicious-looking turns up at a gun show and wants to buy an ar-15 or four of them, for example at the moment, and 40%