now. welcome to the beat, our top story is new developments right now in what s shaping up to be the case of the decade for trying to hold liars accountable with real swift justice. fox news on defense, facing over a billion dollars for punishment and lies, it served up and fed the insurrection. as you see here, top fox hosts have clearly been on team trump in public for a long time. we know that. we know sean hannity broke all journalistic rules of pretense by endorsing and publicly campaigning for trump. there s no court punishment for breaking that kind of rule. there just isn t. but there can be penalties for malicious lying, for defamation if you can prove the defendant acting knowingly, maliciously, intentionally. that s hard to prove and that difficult standard is deliberate, which is why this case has to turn on hard evidence, not asking whether hannity is biassed for trump, he is. but asking whether hannity knowingly and maliciously pushed lies that caused immeas
regulate it? what do you want? it s not all y all, do you. but it s not for me. okay. that s a vibe. do you. it could be something you use in college when you have to write a paper or something like that. it s good for cheating. they have more cheating instruments now. cheating back in the day used to be like, move your hand. move your hand. let me see your paper, man. now it s like, that s good. all i m thinking about is college kids just cheating. and it s funny, we looked into this. they re looking at having a water mark or other systems to keep up with it, but the larger question really is whether it becomes like a calculator. do you really that s what they say. when i was in college, those t.i. calculators cost $250 and they could do algebra maerb, and it changed life and nobody uses a slide rule anymore. so maybe it s that. don t know much about