to me, that was the smoking gun. and really, to further that more, and to really hit home the larger implication that hasse, that would make it really difficult for someone like myself, who recruited human assets, and worked with human assets, to do my job. and also, i worked with other foreign countries. you know, when you see, any other country sees that this information was out there, and in such an unsecured fashion, it makes it really difficult for them to want to work with the united states. and there have been countless terrorist operations, intelligence operations, that have been incredibly successful. and that is only because of the work that we have done with foreign countries and their intelligence services. and so, i m extremely concerned about the implications that this is going to have for the future, and for the future of our work with other intelligence services. peter, there s the sheer number of documents. there s the condition they were held in there, the real worl
talk about the affidavit, the legal implications, and all of that. really, to frank s point, with a zeroed in on really with the levels of security markings that were there. to me, that was the smoking gun. and really, to further that more, and to really hit home the larger implication that hasse, that would make it really difficult for someone like myself, who recruited human assets, and worked with human assets, to do my job. and also, i worked with other foreign countries. you know, when you see, any other country sees that this information was out there, and in such an unsecured fashion, it makes it really difficult for them to want to work with the united states. and there have been countless terrorist operations, intelligence operations, that have been incredibly successful. and that is only because of the work that we have done with foreign countries and their intelligence services. and so, i m extremely concerned about the implications that this is going to have for the future,
clarence thomas has to recuse himself of any kind of issues related to what has come before the supreme court? hasse too is always in quotes, because he decides for himself, and it is under the standard of would a reasonable person think that he couldn t be impartial. they have been, as we have just heard, she has been a cultural warrior sort of picture on the right. he has been with her too. but i don t think we will see him recusing from anything having to do with january 6th. and his reasoning will be, i can still be fair, and nobody could take issue. unless there is something that directly involves her, evidence involving her, et cetera. then i think he would step aside, but a blanket refusal for january six, we won t see. it okay, so these are hearings as you know, they shed some light on how rioters view the former vice president s decision not to overturn the election results in general sixth. let s take a look at this.