the man i ll find you the crime. the truth s the indictment in new york is absurd. i said over, it has nothing to do with indictment and everything to do with donald trump. if trump went home to mar-a-lago relaxed given up his future, retired, none of this would be happening, but he is a live direct threat to the death of corrupt corruption. do you think that established republicans comprehend what is a taking place, democrats want to nationalize the election system. super impose it on the nation so. theyment to pack the court, and pack the senate, and destroy t the electoral college. that party s plan for keeps, that is not a party that
16-year-old intern. it is disgusts, and lbj was worse, abuse of women in the oval office. put things in context, ladies and gentlemen, what is going on in manhattan and atlanta. oh, trump called and said can you find votes that is legal. or trump and documents. he didn t sell t them or give them away, they were at mar-a-lago under protecttion of secret service. attempt to tie him to violence on january 6 and presenting transfer of one government to the next. i ll be right back. hey, man. you could save hundreds for safe driving with liberty mutual. they customize your car insurance. so you only pay for what you need! whoo! we gotta go again. only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty.
visit to the americas. where she met with house speaker kevin mccarthy last week. beijing warns u.s. is on a quote wrong and dangerous road. i m jon scott, now back to life, liberty and levin. mark: welcome back we re here with bradley smith. my question. under the bragg theory, basically anything do you to help yourself can be considered a positive act on behalf of a campaign. therefore all of the rest is ignored just the fact it works toward a positive image in a campaign or positive asset toward a campaign. what about all money that bragg is expending going after trump. ko. could the argument be made, following bragg s
i think that is what you mentioned, having made that point, fec looked at case and decided to not pursuit tomorrit, it is not a violation of the law. one more thing, not just they are campaign extenttures. it is you can t use campaign funds to pay for those things. it is illegal to use campaign funds to pay for those. that is one of underlying you know leaving aside the sense of injustice a lot of people have, if bragg were not prosecuting trump for not using campaign funds and not reporting it, right, he would be you know if trump did use campaign fundings high would be chasing trump for illegal converting campaign funds to personal use. you have a clear sense he was going donald trump he would use charge either way. that is not the rule of law, this is not how campaign finance law works. very well put, i have a
another example. if i am a businessman, businessmen like trump have lawsuit filed against them and businesses, suppose i own a couple restaurants, i run for congress, i have claims of racial discrimination in my business, i don t want them to interfere with the campaign, i go to my corporate lawyer, i think they are pure you know nonsense. but i want them settled. my lawyer said, no, don t settle. there is no way they will win. i said, i just don t want the press playing up this like a big story, settle them, i can t use campaign funds to set those legal challenges. or potential legal claims. those are personal functions, so it is with the thing that went on here money was paid. to stormy daniels, for her agreement to not repeat her allegations of the affair with mr. trump. it is not a campaign expenditure.