have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corru corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, it it says: so he takes a brib bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set f forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, d does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did joc jack the r ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed positively to th
have told you in past, h d two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed
have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contribu
what did the jury say: so he brings a frivolous case on 6 charges, takes a statute, dialing with elections, and pulls it out. he is rebrighting t rewriting statutes because he wants to do injustice. he is has the wrong mind set, he targets people, and hunts them and destroys them, they shipped him off to the hague to chase town genocidal maniacs, but
what did the jury say: so he brings a frivolous case on 6 charges, takes a statute, dialing with elections, and pulls it out. he is rebrigh rewriting statutes because he wants to do injustice. he is has the wrong mind set, he targets people, and hunts them and destroys them, they shipped him off to the hague to chase town genocidal maniacs, but