started stalking her. we were talking late at night. she got really panicked and said, i think there s someone outside. watching her every move. knowing where she is at her house, which lights were on. making disturbing calls with a disguised voice. suddenly, rachael disappeared and a desperate search began. you can see the vastness and all the various places that you can conceal a body. months went by. the case stalled. and then, the case became darker and bigger than they ever could have guessed. this is very tantalizing. absolutely. my spurs but it was out of a hitchcock movie, a moment of pure evil. a moment of pure evil. he had a lock on his feel that i could describe as satan. and just maybe a second woman in the crosshairs. if the stories were true, then you had married a stranger. hello, and welcome to dateline. the story are about to hear begins with and all too familiar tragedy. a vivaciously woman disappears and police put them in her
And this is dateline. I even got hypnotize once to try and communicate with my mom to see if she could tell me Rachel Anderson had one great passion she loved being a mom so much and with kids at home it was extra scary when someone started stalking her. She got real panicked and she said. I think theres someone outside watching her every move knowing where shes at in her house making disturbing calls suddenly rachael disappeared and the desperate search began. Months went by the case stalled then investigators learned might be bigger and than they ever could have guessed this is whispers that rachael was the victim of something out of hitchcock. Movie a moment of pure evil. And just maybe, a second woman in the crosshairs. If the choices were true then you are married a stranger. Exactly. Hello and welcome to dateline the story youre about to hear our begins too with all too familiar a woman disappears and police put the Men In Her Life under a microscope. Thats how this but as detect
rachel is gone forever. he ensured that her body, her physical essence, is also gone forever. but we can t let that allow him to escape responsibility. after seven days of testimony, the case went to the jury. let me ask you that cut to the quick chase question, on friday that night, at the garage did you get her down on the ground, did you throttle your wife until ? i can tell you, honestly, no. it s a lie. it s between being portrayed a stuff that hasn t taken place. i ve done many things, that i m not proud of. paid my dues, moved on. try to be a better person. the whole threat of this thing, i ll kill your wife, if you ll kill mine. did that happen? i can t answer that for you for. you can answer? i can t. couple and says he s made mistakes along the way. but did not kill rachel. i don t have that in me. i want to care about people, i want to love them. i do want to take somebody s life. one officer, he says i m a sociopath. i have no her.
came back again to a central question, could the jury believe david stone? at the end of the day, what stone is telling you, it can t be true. there is no physical evidence of any foul play, anywhere. at four near that shot. charles capone declined to testify in his own defense. and you feel costs double in that decision? yes, sir. prosecutor bill thompson had the final word for the state. rachel is gone forever. he ensured that her body, her physical essence, is also gone forever. but we can t let that allow him to escape responsibility. after seven days of testimony, the case went to the jury. let me ask you that cut to the quick chase question, on friday that night, at the garage did you get her down on the ground, did you throttle your wife until ? i can tell you, honestly, no. it s a lie. it s between being portrayed a stuff that hasn t taken place. i ve done many things, that i m not proud of. paid my dues, moved on. try to be a better person.
around particularly how the drug war ends up scooping folks into american prison ls. and i kept thinking in this case, that notion that the crimes for which people are being detained in this case are so often status offenses, i wonder if it raises or ought to raise our ethical concerns to an even more heightened level, not that we shouldn t also be concerned with the human rights of those who commit other sorts of crimes. it s sort of a cut to the chase question. one thing i researched in the giant war on drugs is it began in the 1800s with laws against chinese immigrants. we didn t want to put them in jail because they were chinese and racist and threat to the american jobs. so we said let s find a trn to put them in jail to thinly veil the fact that we re putting them on jail in racially social control. so we came up with opium laws they didn t say we re going to put you in jail because you re