Back to hurt us now. Back to the 21 days and if its really enough time for someone to be declared totally out of the woods of doctor of Environmental Edge nearing, charles hoss, figures its not even close. Whwhy do you worry. If we look at the past outbreaks that occurred, plus the first nine months of the current downtown outbreak, anywhere between one in 500 and one in eight people who get ebola got it after day 21. So, what do you look for . What if you had to give a period of monitoring someone, would it be 30 days, 40 days . Well, first of all, would like to know that theyve been screened for antibodies and other signs. But more than 21 days will be needed. Theres never a point we get to zero risk so its balancing the cost of Public Health and the cost of keeping people in quarintine. Maybe the fear factor was in play here. Didnt want to keep people watched for more than 21 days. Theres a fear factor and a real cost of keeping the people under confinement and lost wages and so for