Replace any removed trees with were going to go for an evergreen species that opens the canopy and allows for more visibility while maintaining the ficus trees and maintaining visibility. Here is a diagram of how we expect to work. I hope its readable. It maps out on hyde and grove street the Maintenance Area for taking care of the existing grove and the several areas that the library is committed to start right away building new planting areas on fulton street and right over the entrance to brooks hall. Then we want to explore together with public works and bars, there are triangles of land that we may be able to cultivate with sheet mulching. We also are showing areas where the trees will be replaced. The sixthfloor patio is a very good candidate for more greening as well. So in terms of demonstrating commitment by setting up the these okay. 30 seconds. 30 seconds. Okay. I further outline the steps in more detail, but basically what were asking tonight is that we modify this permit t
Garage or driveway is a most common example. There is a big way, if the tree can be removed and replaced, we just do we cant do the appraised value because we are not losing a planting site. We are working on actually tightening up our code a little bit to beef it up in the phase of development. Right now, one of the other triggers, when there is traction triggers that reek wire Tree Planting, linear frontage. One tree, or in lieu fee is required per 20 feet of frontage area typical 25 foot wide singlefamily home reek is the tree or in lieu fee. Lets say there are no trees that require planting one tree. That is not triggered with this particular application. If it was we would be looking at all frontages of the entire parcel and add up 20 linear feet and figure out if they are short trees are yet it is Development Impact fee. Again, the average house requires one. That is a trigger that does not involve, or is in play here, but that is in play for driveways. I dont know if ive answere
Presentation again. Its confusing. I read this and i was appalled. Because what i see, because i have a background a little bit in commercial real estate sure. I see upper plaza looking to enhance the value of their property selfishly, and i say that again, selfishly. This one has the value of the building because they can bring customers to upper plaza while people are charging their cars, they can sell more condos or rent more apartments or have more people come to the movies or retail or whatever. So i see that. And then i see tesla having a convenient location, im not doubting your points of view, to sell more cars. And then i see the citizens of the city of San Francisco compromised because they lose more trees in an already overly deforested canopy. I dont get it. I dont get it at all. And then you didnt answer the question or the question that i heard. Did you look at other sites in San Francisco that would not deforest San Francisco, that would not result in compromising the ur
And thats 1718 there. Are there any questions . Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you. Are there any members of the public that wish to testify on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Mr. Chairman, i would move that we send this to the full board with a positive recommendation. Great. Done. Thank you. [gavel] mr. Clerk, please call item number 5. Resolution receive around approving the annual report for the ocean Avenue Community benefit district for the fiscal year 20172018. Welcome back up, ms. Mar. Thank you. So ocean avenue is an initial assessment budget of 239,578. First established in 2010 and set to expire on june 30th, 2025. Their staff is executive director daniel weaver, the Service Areas are safety and community ambassadors, cleaning program, administration and corporate operations. We reviewed the same benchmarks for ocean avenue c. B. D. , variouses in benchmark 2, theyre required to raise 1 of the nonassessment revenue from i mean, the total budget from nonass
Clerk is ms. Erika major and msy announcements . Yes, please make sure to silence all cellphones and Electronic Devices and copies of any documents to be included as part of a file should be submitted to a clerk. Items will appear on the september 17th, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Supervisor peskin could you please read the first item. Clerk an ordinance amending the environment code to require all non residential buildings of 50,000 square feet or more to provide all on site electricity demands from 100 Greenhouse Gas free or Renewable Resources or sources to authorization the director of the department of the environment to adopt the rules and regulations and affirming appropriate findings. Supervisor peskin on behalf of the department of the environment, mr. Sheehan, the floor is yours. Thank you, supervisors. Charles she an, policy and Public Affairs manager for the San Francisco department of the environment. Momentarily im going to invite my colleague, Ba