ok. i m sorry. you can t come back twice to the public comment. actually there was an instruction that the chief operatoring officer john haley to speak with you. ok. thank you. moving on to the consent calendar. these items are considered to be routine unless an item is asked to be considered separately. we have one member of the public who has requested that item 10.2k be severed. this has to do with establishing a bus zone to 75 feet easterly. other than that, there have been no requests by the public. 10.1 also as well. so that leaves the remaining consent calendar. 10.2 minus k and then the rest of the consent calendar. is there a motion? move to approve. all in favor say aye. ok. let s go to the other two. 10.1. i don t know how much of this we can discuss publically but it concerns the safety-discipline report we get on a few of these items is incomplete. we just ushered mr. haley out. let s do the other one first. 10.2k has to do with traff
that is correct. all right. so then will that apply also to the medallions that go out through the retiree program? or only to direct sales? the way i read it is that we would have to repurcha for the initial purchase price. in the retiree scenario, we at the m.t.a. do not realize the full purchase price. so for example in the retiree scenario we only get 15% of the repurchase price. the situation is that we currently have or we are walking towards a situation where we will have transferable medallions and nontransferable medallions. i think you are talking about a revenue that might come monthly to the m.t.a. and when we are talking about transferable medailyions, those sold by a previous owner to new owner or that were held because of the death or surender of a previous owner and are being sold out right to the new owner. so it really covers direct sales situation. this is not public to a program where we will be splitting it with a retiree? no. other than some of
i think you are talking about a revenue that might come monthly to the m.t.a. and when we are talking about transferable medailyions, those sold by a previous owner to new owner or that were held because of the death or surender of a previous owner and are being sold out right to the new owner. so it really covers direct sales situation. this is not public to a program where we will be splitting it with a retiree? no. other than some of the transfer fees go to the driver fund. but that is the only split. if we are forced, we will have a situation where we realized all of the funds or the vast majority of them in the first instance. right. my question is, is there any calculation for depreciation for use of the medallions? i realize that it is hopefully something that will never come to pass. but if we did have to repurchase a huge lot of medallions it would be very expensive. to give somebody the original purchase price when they had the use of the medallion for a lon
would have to repurcha for the initial purchase price. in the retiree scenario, we at the m.t.a. do not realize the full purchase price. so for example in the retiree scenario we only get 15% of the repurchase price. the situation is that we currently have or we are walking towards a situation where we will have transferable medallions and nontransferable medallions. i think you are talking about a revenue that might come monthly to the m.t.a. and when we are talking about transferable medailyions, those sold by a previous owner to new owner or that were held because of the death or surender of a previous owner and are being sold out right to the new owner. so it really covers direct sales situation. this is not public to a program where we will be splitting it with a retiree? no. other than some of the transfer fees go to the driver fund. but that is the only split. if we are forced, we will have a situation where we realized all of the funds or the vast majority of th
opportunity to address your item k. the specific issue that s all right. i will wait. start again, sir. once again, i am charles riggs. i am speaking on behalf of my neighbors and residents in the east mission area in the boundaries of the neighborhood that i gave to you. i believe item k is a proper item for me to speak k. i have been advised that the special issue of the number 10 bus using the 25th street hampshire location is what we have been trying to resolve. she advises me there is in the works a possibility for actually doing that. a cheeky fellow once observed that it is only to those without hope that hope is actually given. we do have some hope to resolve this very serious problem, new sanlses and hazards that have been created by that number 10 town s end bus. if you go forward as planned and remove that, that will be much appreciated by our neighbors. there are two issues that we have not yet heard addressed. one is the deadline for removal of that number