thank you, pat, for that wonderful introduction. i am really excited to talk with you. i am looking forward to it myself. i want to turn to your book in just a moment, but i also want to begin, because i know that you had wanted to talk about how your team was put together for that hearing, and to the knowledge so many of the people who are here today from the opening salvo in history. did you want to say just a few things? i always like to say thank you. i did testify, and many of you have this vision, the image of me sitting there by myself at that long table with all of the senators lined up in front of me, but i also want to remind you that i had some wonderful people who, as i say, had my back, who came together really, because they believed in the process, the integrity of the court, as i did, and they wanted to make sure that at best i could be fairly treated as best as they could help me. one of those people i see one of those people i know, judith resnik, who y
it would continue to apply to the ada as it does to title 7. it did not apply as sweepingly as two teachers. we had this debate with justice breyer over whether you say that congress excluded retaliation cases. but it was at a time when this court had a position that religious organizations could not participate in getting public funding even when they were providing remedial services to low-income students. we repeated that doctrine repudiated that doctrine. you should comply in some instances with the same rules. when you leave it to be read into do catholic schools and parochial schools share the public funds the same way that they do? no, they do not. you bet they do not. do not tell me that fair is fair and that it is now like everybody else. it is not true. it was recognized in your opinion in smith and in justice kennedy s opinion that where you have doctrines you do not second-guess religious doctrine. you do a balancing test to make sure of that the
Transcripts For CSPAN Hunter College 20111016 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
requirement requiring costly changes will affect the industry and the nation s air space. in closing while we support the concept of low cost national wattage broad band system, no system can be allowed to compromise the safety and security of the national air transportation system. change that is affect the national air transportation system require long range planning and we encourage companies to participate. we have been working towards nexgen for nearly 20 years. if neighboring technologies need changes in order to be compatible these companies need to work with the f.a.a. and rtca so that the next generation of products might be designed and certified to be compatible with their future business plans once the current generation reaches the service life. . . service of to the idea of a new entra to the marketplace can introduce a market compromises aviatio safety and security while expected deviation industry to design a manufacture, test and and certify and restore the
country, doing so, under the guise of, quote, civil rights. joining me is charles ogle tree, how do you do? doing great, reverend sharpton. hope you re doing well. great. let s take a look at a map. we had a mash, showing these states, all have had introduced to them antiaffirmative action, and some were called civil rights laws is this something we re seeing all over is the country? remember, jennifer grass was one of the plaintiffs in the michigan case the supreme court did not uphold that case. she now works for the american civil liberties group in sacramento. that s a conconservative group.