This path was constructed strictly as a construction path to get equipment to the site and our decision was if this is construction related it could be issued as a street space permit, however, prior to signing off on the project, whatever was constructed whether it was just ripping through some landscaping, that needs to be restored to its original condition before we seen off on the project. Thus, at this point were still expecting that that temporary path will be restored. As a matter of fact, i believe we conditioned the permit upon that. However, in talking to mr. William, just now, i mean, he informed me that theyre willing to allow construction of it to address mark brands point. Yes, we can a allow this under an encroachment permit, we can make it permanent, so to speak, provided he gets consent from the two neighboring properties. In this case consent is required because its something thats not constructed to city standards. The 15 foot wide 150id walk is proposed per city sta
Constructed to city standards. The 15 foot wide 150id walk is proposed per city standards, thus no consent is required, its already legislative sidewalk. For this additional path consent would be required from the conjoining Property Owners. If that is obtained we can issue that as a minor encroachment permit. I have nothing else to add. Any questions id be glad to answer. Thank you. Commissioners, the matter is submitted. Quite a history lesson, commissioner. Im not sure, my memory whether i made the comment that was a really long walkway on mountain spring. I remember the case, but our review of it was predominantly on the parking variant, a little differently than the other entitlement hearings and appeal that is have occurred on this particular project. Im not sure that i can craft any type of compromise here. It looks like people are pretty well entrenched. The question then is whether legislative sidewalk done to city standards, whether that department ered in terms of their appr
Whatever was constructed, whether it was just ripping through some landscaping, that needs to be restored to its original condition before we seen off on the project. Thus, at this point were still expecting that that temporary path will be restored. As a matter of fact, i believe we conditioned the permit upon that. However, in talking to mr. William, just now, i mean, he informed me that theyre willing to allow construction of it to address mark brands point. Yes, we can a allow this under an encroachment permit, we can make it permanent, so to speak, provided he gets consent from the two neighboring properties. In this case consent is required because its something thats not constructed to city standards. The 15 foot wide 150id walk is proposed per city standards, thus no consent is required, its already legislative sidewalk. For this additional path consent would be required from the conjoining Property Owners. If that is obtained we can issue that as a minor encroachment permit. I
Good evening ladies and gentlemen, my name is kevin. I have come here today to discuss about the rewarding opportunity that i have stumbled upon because of Charity Cultural services scepter. I recently lost my job in june and i have learned that they provide tuition free culinary program, including bartending classes. I immediately signed up for the classes early august this year and notified that the classes werent going to begin until september due to uncompleted construction work on that unit with the bar. I learned that the previous lessons were all head at far east cafe but the owner needed to open up the restaurant twoandahalf hours early ahead to have time so that we can use the space. It was a torture for someone who needs to work late at night. They expected the space allocated for bartending classes to be completed soon, thus made the decision to move the classes back to the center. When the classes finally started on september 22, which was fairly late compared to the previo
Turning radius so thats r just not foing to happen. Thats not the intention at this point. Whatever happens with that will be way in the future because karens planning on fibbishing this project and selling it. It is true. Hes been trying to sell it for a long time now. Hard to sell when you dont have access to it. Doctor shoe said thered been a bait and switch. We floated a whole bunch of ideas for the neighbors on how to make that driveway fly. We wanted to get a driveway in there, we offered park, we offered extra parking for the downhill neighbors, ones who dont have down hill parking, well thought maybe that would get people intrepsed. Interested. There was no bait and switch. The final application we made wasnt the same as five of those ideas we put out there because we couldnt apply with all of them. Yes, we were very clear we wanted a driveway. And the board of supervisors didnt deny the project unanimously twice. The fist time it didnt get out of the committee so it just table