say bigger legal implications from all of this? well, one of the interesting things that we, that this presents us with, right, is that, you know, there is still ongoing investigations in various parts in the feds as well as in the states. and it is, you know, one of the unusual things is that, you know, you have the georgia investigation, the georgia grand jury, and special grand jury, and they have heard testimony of a number of people, including people who did not and have not spoken to jack smith s investigation for example, and one of the things that i know that is going to present itself in coming months, kate is that federal prosecutors are going to want to see some of the work that went into the investigation, and into the fani willis investigation is that they are getting ready for their own trial, and there might be additional defendants named in the jack smith investigationcom things that i am looking at is if there is anybody here or something here that might be
charge, and that generally is 20-30 years punishment, it could be life in prison but that generally doesn t happen. the funny thing about this is this particular aggravating murder charge isn t used very often. in fact, one of the lawmakers behind this, tara simmons, herself by the way a convicted felon who madeke it into the ste legislature, she says it has only been used once. i don t necessarily think that is the case, this is not something very easily trackable, but let s say it was in fact usn just once, that literally means it is not racist, it is not being t used to target black peoplepe and this would have zeo impact whatsoever on racial equity in the criminal justice system. one time does not mean it is a problem. in fact, the argument should be we are not using it enough. will: so with the rationale, jason, that lawmakers and californians have used it to go about leaving shoplifting can for example, and small theft unpunished because they cite disparate impact on
basically the government has decreed that people who want access to facebook what s happened to it will have to pay a fee for doing so are you an internet company that we spoke to said the charge isn t that great it s charge per megabyte but it all adds up and they said it has the potential to triple or quadruple people s internet bundles which they say is unjustified a lot of people are asking well why is the government doing this people are saying it s because they want to crack down on free speech in these types of conversations about politics that happen naturally on social media it s hard to know exactly how many people this will affect but we do you know i read a report today that internet uptake in bending is growing very rapidly as their potential e a lot of people ok so there s a sense element here trying to track down an undesirable dinny and what are the people in between doing to fight this well they re rallying on social media as it
or is there any merit to what he is alleging as far as she included with the russians? yeah, there is this long running theory he has been peddling that had been checked out by various fact check organizations about her selling some uranium deposits. it was essentially a transaction that was approved by multiple government agencies during the obama administration. it wasn t something controlled by hillary clinton herself. so it s found to not be true. but he is distracting i think from this russian news. and it s not working i think with americans who oppose him. but i do think to his base that it does work. people sort of make fun or joke about the president using twitter. but i think he is successfully distracting his political base from these looming charges against his former aides, it looks like. but will time run out on that distraction if that investigation continues to bring more charges. and the big question i want to ask you is how significant will be it be if this charge
it wasn t something controlled by hillary clinton herself. so it s found to not be true. but he is distracting i think from this russian news. and it s not working i think with americans who oppose him. but i do think to his base that it does work. people sort of make fun or joke about the president using twitter. but he is successfully distracting his political base from these looming charges against his farmer aides it looks like. but will time run out on that distraction if that investigation continues to bring more charges. and the big question i want to ask you is how significant will be it be if this charge isn t directly related to the trump team colluding with the russians if it s something very indirectly related. i think it s too early for, you know, trump himself or his supporters to declare a victory. and it s too early for trump s critics. it s going to be unclear based