the american public will stand for nothing less than the total report, with the exception of the things that show how they, through the intelligence sources, gathered information. but the american public will not be satisfied. democrats or republicans will not be satisfied. and all of the american public out there who has worked on this, listened to this for more than two years, really wants to know what the details are. and so, eventually, it may be a fight, it may be a struggle, but eventually, the story will come out, and whatever barr says tomorrow, or the next day, will simply be chapter headings. and we do know that, as you point out, all of the american public wants to know, democrats and republicans, i know the house took a vote on just that, and it was unanimous. 400 people said that full report should come out. but here is the argument from deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. quote, punishing wrong had-doers
report, planned to investigate at least 4,000 insider threats, cases where they said they were concerned that one of their own might have compromised information. the irony, of course, is the fact that the entire story was leaked to the the washington post by one of their own edward snowden. that s right. i wonder if he was on the list of 4,000 and they just didn t get around to him. probably not. it is really extraordinary and tells, you know, just how much money we are spending on these security efforts and also shows how the cia, although had has been in trouble in years past really has gotten back on the strong footing and biggest recipient of this. but, this is something that was not meant to be public. and you just have to wonder how much more edward snowden provided information there is out there and that we are going to find out about. i mean, we should point out, marah, that the post said that there is a treasure trove. they had the entire budget and they went out of
heard before. the story line is familiar. what i am saying is that the chapter headings are different. guest: but the thing is not end, so what? if you support newt gingrich that is your guy. he who casts a first stone . neil: but in that state . they feel very strongly about . guest: if they, if he is their guy, why does it matter? neil: if she their guy that is one thing but if they are thinking about it. guest: wait, wait, the conservatives are strong on forgiveness, acceptance and future. this is not something that is happening right now. with bill clinton that was something while he was in office, there were allegations. so far in the past i don t know that it is necessarily going to affect people so deeply because he had accepted it and moved forward from it. neil: but does it cast a seed of doubt? the people start saying, well, i