i think they re saying when it comes to the issues that matter to them, they are not focused on those sorts of things. whenever you ve talked to these republicans who are not in that kind of election denier camp, the term we re using, they want to pivot back to the issues they are focused on, the policies they want to change. they re not talking about, and then i want to change x, y, and z when it comes to election laws. are these folks that just from a rhetorical perspective say i m worried about voter fraud or are they actually upon assuming office trying to make changes? and are they changes that are not just, say, rolling back covid era changes or affecting law. why democrats aren t talking more about the economy and i do think they are. but the reason they re talking about threats to our democracy is exactly what you laid out which is there are election deniers out there that are on the ballot that could potentially be elected. i think it is right for president biden to go and
the proposals are not very politically viable especially when you re pushing some of these change x outs out a numbe years, you don t know whether the congress in a few years will have the with illl to enact wha there. and the cost of insurance still remains something that s hard to know. the president keeps maintaining that we can t offer we can t tell insurance companies no to cover people with pre-existing conditions unless they have enough clients to make that worthwhile, so we don t really know how the how the math on that s going to work either. right. we have some sense of how the averages might work out, but i should say, you know, when the cbo says on average person x s premium will go down, that mean person y s premium might go up a little bit but it might not go up as much as person x s. the cbo report is very, very very conditional. yeah. i do think the people that benefit the most from the bill, though, are people that are buying insurance on their own or