Developing countries respond to that at the summit . I know you met with people on the side. Yeah. There are a lot of things that i saw being discussed that relate to the president s plan. We had and most of the meetings i went to were with industry, so it was really fun. Large industries as well as small. We talked about the 111d proposal and the broad context about its sort of gamechanging nature, that its a really strong signal for the u. S. The president s presence there was clearly another strong signal. I also had discussions with oil and gas on methane commitments. There are some great opportunities to work internationally and we have the Largest Companies participating in those discussions through our climate and what is it called . Climate and clean air coalition, which is an International Sort of collaboration with dozens of countries and business sector. We talked a little bit about hfcs. There were big commitments on those as well. There was a lot of discussion over the dev
For reelection without considering the dozens of proposals that are already out there, to pass a more specific statute tailored to isis, i dont know what Congress Left for president obama in that situation. I want to talk about International Law as well. To beh how can you craft legislation when the threat appears to be changing . Group f khorasan, no one talked about that. On tuesday the president mentions this group for first ou time. How can you tailor legislation to a specific threat when you dont know where the next threats coming from . Ve theres a great blog post on steves quout standing blog called just security. Org. It talks essentially about and i think its your response to Jack Goldsmith, the law ok, professor from harvards piece, that its one thing to say, iss okay, we want to narrowly tailon it towards isis and perhaps khorasan and other clearly identifiable groups that are that have core ties to al qaedao its another thing to say as chn Jack Goldsmith andge others are sa