that he can t hand it out to the full committee. if they will see it they ll only see a redacted version of it. which will be one page covered with lines of black because you know the f.b.i. over redacts all of these things. and frankly it s a sign of how much disrespect they have for our nation s elected representatives that they would be engaged in this type of completely inappropriate behavior. i hope that they do hold him in contempt for this because it is clear he is treating congress with disrespect in a way that is unfortunate but what we ve come to expect from the f.b.i. harris: that s what i was going to point to. it is like a game of fetch. the f.b.i. says you want it? come to my house, come over and crawl and get it. that s the ultimate of disrespect. they don t have the classification excuse in this case, harris. typically what they turn to. they don t have that. this is a document that is unclassified. chairman grassley and chairman comer are obviously completely
Biden family profited from a human trafficking scheme that included a prostitution ring in the United States and other countries including Russia and Ukraine.
The White House Office of Communications recently issued a seriesof "questions and answers" on the Medicare legislation before theHouse and the Senate. The point of the issuance was to answer thecritics of the Medicare legislation by responding to the maincriticisms in a question-and-answer format.
Four nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals have become controversial because of an important, but often misunderstood, feature of the judicial confirmation process. That feature, called the “blue-slip” courtesy, highlights the views of Senators from a state in which a judicial nominee would serve. A dispute has arisen regarding whether the views of those home-state Senators should dictate, or merely influence, whether the Senate considers these nominees. More specifically, the question is whether a negative or withheld blue slip should be treated as a veto or as input.