iraq at the type and his own defense secretary say contributed to the rise of isis. and the president s executive actions on immigration, gun control and climate change have ignored a storm of criticism. chris stirewalt tavis smiley says he remembers being there, and so do i. that feeling, whether you supported him or not, was this guy going to be different and unite the country and somehow find a way to separate the wheat from the chaff and bring us together? and now we have our answer. right. and you remember, we all remember, how about how washington, d.c. was seven years ago right now. the anticipation of change, people were exhausted by the bush years.
ways they could not before. they will be allowed to drive tanks, fire mortars lead infantry soldiers into combat. carter added equal opportunity will not mean equal participation and jobs will be assigned by ability. the military s desire to expand the talent it recruits from. the joint chief of chaff previously argued the marine should be allowed to keep women out of certain front line combat jobs. he says he will fully support carter s decision. while the defense secretary gave each bran of the armed services 30-days to submit plans for making the change congress will have to look over the plan and several members of the house armed services will express over the plan. garrett tiny in washington
view for them in that case, but that s a strong vein in the republican party, that says light them up. how do voters react when they hear the republicans saying, obama, obama, obama. is there does it help separate the wheat from the chaff when they re figuring out who to vote for? the migrant issue is enormous. and all the candidates are coming to one point of view which is at the very least they re where rubio and carson and arguably donald trump were originally, which is not now. at least not now, a freeze. those who were talking about sorting out muslims from chris chance, that will sort itself out and everybody will get to know more migrants. the question now is, voters change. so the politicians chae s chan things warrant. but when the world infringes on
that s a strong vein in the republican party, that says light them up. how do voters react when they hear the republicans saying, obama, obama, obama. is there does it help separate the wheat from the chaff when they re figuring out who to vote for? the migrant issue is enormous. and all the candidates are coming to one point of view which is at the very least they re where rubio and carson and arguably donald trump were originally, which is not now. at least not now, a freeze. those who were talking about sorting out muslims from chris chance, that will sort itself out and everybody will get to know more migrants. the question now is, voters change. so the politicians chae s chan things warrant. but when the world infringes on
conclusion as a committee. how much has it stung, that it was two house republicans, mccarthy and hanna, how much has it stung you, that they have helped create this atmosphere that has called the committee s credibility into question? well, look, everybody s familiar with different misstatements and mischaracterizations and oops moments. so hillary clinton s no stranger to this. she said, we came, we saw, he died. or her testimony in the senate side that was mischaracterized frankly when she said, what difference does it make? so that s the nature of politics. is it helpful when someone characterizes it as political? no. but my point, all of that stuff is chatter and chaff that burns away. and that tomorrow we ll be focused in on what was the secretary s involvement, what did she know and then the conversation shifts.