adviser pretrial hearing, peter navarro is in federal court fighting the congressional subpoenas issued over the committee investigating january 6. he claimed executive privilege and that trump later regretted not letting navarro of it. and the judge called the argument weak sauce, and i quote. what do you make of the nature of that response? it seems to be setting a tone for some of the arguments coming out of trump world. not surprised by the judge s response and there were similar comments made in the mark meadows proceeding in georgia by the judge where the judge was questioning the credibility of certain statements made by mark meadows as he s tried to argue that all of his actions were under the color of law and somehow related to some very important federal policy. but in the case of navarro, one big problem, he is claiming that trump man as certification of executive privilege, but there .
2020 election in georgia. you can t ever accept when they steal and rig and rob. reporter: meadows who has kept a stunningly low profile amid the various investigations into donald trump now breaking his silence on the case under oath. those were challenging times bluntly meadows told the court. as meadows seeks to move his case from state to federal court, the focus, prosecutors delved into the allegations against meadows. meadows denying that he directed another white house aid to write a memo about how to delay or disrupt the certification of the election on january 6. saying that he had zero recollection of that happening. and it was the biggest surprise to me upon reading the indictment. putting meadows on the stand to challenge the events he is accused of participating in in georgia, a risky approach for any criminal defendant. meadows looking to make the case that his activities after the 2020 election were part of his official dutsies as chief of
jury selection to begin march 4. that is just one day before super tuesday or when more than a dozen states hold their primary elections. judge tanya chutkan said the trial date does not depend on the defendant s personal and professional obligations and that she d be watching for anything that might poison the jury pool including public comments by trump or his lawyers. and that wasn t the only trump-related election subversion case to see major developments. former chief of staff took the stand in georgia in what amendmented to essentially a preview trial of the case there. sarah maury has more. reporter: former white house chief of staff mark meadows to start wholesale trying to change the way that we conduct elections state by state. i can tell you that we re asking for problems, we re asking for fraud. reporter: taking the stand in a federal courtroom in georgia after he, former president trump and 17 others were charged with racketeering by the fulton county district atto
like charleston that summertime rainstorm can produce flooding in downtown charleston. up towards myrtle beach and then towards wilmington. charlotte will probably receive some precipitation from this, but there will be high winds, downed power lines. you could lose power for days, perhaps weeks in some instances if you are in some more isolated areas. you will see a rip current here. the storm surge as i mentioned. can t rule out the potential for an isolated tornado as well. here we go. we ll take you and take a look at what the spaghetti models are suggesting. they have been in very good agreement as far as making landfall. and then approaching georgia and south carolina. and then it looks like not all are in agreement as we go through the next five days. might this just kind of lingering along the coast? if this is going to be a
staff including rararranging th call between between president trump and georgia secretary of state. everybody is on the line. i just want to find 11,780 votes which is one more than we have. because we won the state. reporter: raffensperger also took the stand saying that first tried to resist the call and testifying that there was no federal role in certifying georgia s election. when prosecutors questioned what federal role meadows was fulfilling in post election calls with trump and another purveyor of election falsehoods, his personal attorney rudy giuliani we can not allow these crooks, because that is what they are, to steal an election from the american people. they elected donald trump. they didn t elect joe biden. reporter: meadows said that he was acting as a gatekeeper and insisted that there was a federal interest in accurate and fair elections. meadows also claimed that he