California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes
California argue the law only applied to instate sales. The oral argument or two hours. The argument hearst this morning in case 21 for 60, eight National Pork producers versus ross. Mr. Bishop . Mr. Hief justice, may it please the court, the fact we alleged or seem to be true, but this is a decision here. The state clas the process violates the Commerce Clause, because its an extra territorial regulation that conditions pork sales on ouof state farmers, adopting california preferred forming that these. For no valid safety reasons. Proposition 12 also fails tip because it burdens interstate commerce for no local benefit. California to change farming methods everywhere, to quote, prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme animal confinement. That confinement occurs in othetes. California imports 99. 9 of pork. Decisions like baldwin establish that even when the lais triggered only by instate sales, the state may not project its legislative into he states in that wa to do so infringes
Amy, welcome. Thanks for having. Me lets talk about the term of the 20 20 to 23 term thats ramping up. Maybe this month, maybe next month. Anything that surprised you . Not so far. Were waiting on virtually all of the big decisions. Affirmative action, religion, lgbtq rights on Voting Rights of election law. Its too soon. Were waiting on 27 cases to draw any conclusions about what this version of the court is going to look like this term. Were gonna talk about some of these cases were waiting on. First Ketanji Brown jackson was new this term. What did you see from her. Anything different that you did not expect . Im not sure if i didnt expect. But shes been very active just as perhaps one of the most active new justices. Thats not surprising. And she spent most of her time as a judge. As a trial court judge. She was the only one in the courtroom. She is not dominating by any measure but shes very active. She has a lot of questions. She is often working with the other two liberal justic
Understands upfront this is not going to be me. I want you to answer and give your views. I would say you represent probably about half the country, your view about hst other half represents mine. You agree . What kind of divided plus or. Minus . Certainly divided, yeah. Question i mea plun, you know, pol were polarized, were traumatized. We clearly are in thesares. And were in these echo chambers. I mean, lets be candid, john. I mean, you know, night your folks are watching you and getting a certain perspectivin r my folks are watching other networks getting shot. We have Studies Thatorks and sht of democrats watch me. Well, including me. So im actually im here for watc too. Oint, with the point, though, i think we need more of that crosspollinatiowen. Lariza we need more of these kind ofti conversations. And we need to not just, you know, accusing each other of misleading the American People, but i think confront each other in the context of Providinother Ong Opportunitiesm to addres
Understands upfront. This is not going to be me. I want you to answer and give you our views. I would say that you represent probably about half the country. If you our views and the other half represents mine, do you agree . We are kind of divided. Plus or minus. We are polarized and traumatized. We are in these echo chambers. Lets be candid, sean, your folks are watching you and getting to certain perspective and my folks are watching other networks and getting their perspective. Sean a lot of democrats watch me. Including me. Im here for the reason. To the point, we need that Cross Polarization it, more of these kind of conversations. Not accused of each other of misleading the American People, by then confront each other on the context of providing opportunities to address some of the facts are often omitted in terms of the conversations and topics which we choose to pick up. Sean what i see is that i dont how you reconcile some of these differences. Your belief and secure borders