of running of the company. yes, he says he s going to deal with more of the computer and back channel those kind of things. but really, how much control will he really relinquished? but really, how much control will he really relinquish? is itjust going to be someone who takes over as the head of twitter in name but not in reality? i think that is what a lot of analysts are suspecting. that he will still have his hand in a lot of ceo business. and let s get some analysis from a tech commentator on the outcome of the poll: i m not surprised in the least. clearly, there are lots of people who are upset with the things he has been doing at twitter and the constant changes back and forth. look, everybody has to go through the process of debating different sides of things. the issue is, you don t usually make all of that public. you don t make every step along the way public. and that s what he is doing. and it s just really kind of exposing someone, exposing him as not being someone who re
you can t disconnect your private business interests, don t take the job. here s the thing, if jared kushner was going to take a position in the white house, why did he choose to work on things that were so tied to lenders and ceos? yeah. get out of the business. the ceo business. dirty. gary cohn didn t want to create the groups. jared did. jared wanted to create those groups. he then wasn t completely divided from his family. now that we look closer at the loans, are they good loans? did they make economic success? the kushner company wants you to believe, we always did business with citi and apollo. what are the terms of the loans? if they stink, it ll seem strange. 666 fifth avenue is sitting on a mountain of debt. it is a nasty deal. who is going to finance it? what do the companies get in exchange for it? nobody ever writes in a loan form. what do they get? i m sorry. if we had huge infrastructure programs here, public/private