I am ok with the president making a goodfaith belief. Im ok with that. I think the fact here is one of bad faith. The reason why the president s statement is relevant is not the political theater. It is a statement he says he was asked, and he said no. The Justice Department said, this cant happen. Suddenly, you lose up already. I think it is bad faith. We are in uncharted waters. You will find that theres not much written on the take care clause. That is why the separation of powers trumps the Immigration Law when it goes too far. These provisions grant discretion, but to grant the amount of discretion now is unconstitutional. I should add that the memo does not put that much weight on these supervision, but the doj did. They shifted position of these provisions to put more weight on it. There is discretion but it is within the take care clause, which we have to litigate, and it will be at the fifth circuit any minute. Rep. Poe i want to reclaim my time. I didnt ask you to tell me how
People to coordinate this. One specifically with Online Technology knowledge to make sure we get this implemented and implemented well. This would be positions that continue being funded by the School District. And as we go through our annual budgeting process. They would be allocated into that. So again this is onetime funding. The student counseling sessions are the extra boost we are doing right now around the community. Extra outreach sessions with families for counselors to really focus on this group of juniors. The targeted support is again to give us a boost for this current class of juniors. Who are the first to be hallowed to these graduation requirements. And to be sure that we have that extra support or the opportunity to give that extra support. Like we had the opportunities in Summer School. Of this 2. 7, which categories are onetime in nature . Maybe you can just call out which ones were. There is the ideal world and the reality world. I think that the afterschool Credit
Into our reserves and we will be faced with sequestration and child care and we have competing needs. If you are asking the city to put in reserves to pay for this very worthy cause. That i think that the School District is saying is a priority. Why wont the School District put in reserves as well . Thank you, sorry i had to be out of chambers for a moment. But we have a significant priority on ag. And hope everything you have heard from the sfusd team reinforces that. We have the 2014 group front and center in priorities in every respect and including funding. We have set aside funds in the 1213 budget to help meet these targets. We can give you a report on the debatails of that. And in addition we think that in the coming years we will reexamining our budget for 1314 and beyond to make sure we maintain the critical investments. I will say that one of the events which i think you have heard about is the loss of 21st century funds did come at a relatively late stage in this process. So
And the remainder is onetime in natu nature . Through the School System and budgeting process, we will have to budget for a centralized Evening School. That would be ongoing, but the exact cost of that is probably double what we have in here. If we dont get the afterschool funding we will have to expand the evening options. So would the 1. 7 be one time in terms of requesting it from the city, is that the ask . Right. Yes. Because then the School District is going to have to determine how are they going to provide centralized Evening School moving forward in a sustainable way. For the most part including the site report this sounds like a onetime request . I am sorry i think the question is really around. We are backfilling cuts that the School District has seen. These are previously funded activities that the School District has sustained over time. Could you clarify in terms of what have is backfilling that need. Versus what is onetime requests that dont need to be refunded again in
And we all see something in the future that we may have to make cuts for. Right. I think that as bad the cuts have been and what i appreciate about meyung, though we have had to have furlough days we havent had the numbers that other districts have had to have. And part of that is looking ahead to say if, we didnt have that for the next two years to use, we would then have to have furlough days that would limit our time as we are. As part of it from hearing him explain this across to the principals as well too. That when you look at out a threeyear budget cycle what hes done is say, we need this amount to supplement, to even keep schools open for the number of days versus cutting. Instead of having 1. 5 furlough days this year, versus 10 furlough days like other districts. Where i know a bunch of that is, but more details beyond that. Thank you. Thank you for your time and i want to see if anything you didnt cover in the presentation. I want to be sure in terms of our commitment to acc