Delhi High Court High-End KPO Services Provider Can t Be Compared With ITeS, Which Is BPO Services Provider: Delhi High Court Case Title: PCIT Versus Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd..
Indirect Taxes Supreme Court Excise Duty Exemption | To Determine If A Product Falls Under Description "Intravenous Fluids”, Its Composition & Not Its Use Matters : Supreme Court Case.
Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 682 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 713NOMINAL INDEXOxfam India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 682 RANJEET KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2023.
The Delhi High Court has directed the adjudicating authority to process Blackberry’s claim of interest under Section 11BB of the Excise Act.The bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Amit Mahajan.
The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Blackberry India, stating that services, except those under Rule 3(1) of Export of Services Rules, qualify as export of taxable services. The court also found Blackberry India not to be an intermediary based on the agreement with Blackberry Singapore.