Board of supervisors i think when you sell a property, it should be the default that it no longer has all of these other agreements on the lien of the property. In this particular case, i would be hoping that the recreation and Park Department in light of this going on can we yes, sir can we as a body of people here in San Francisco county, citizenry, can we try to Eminent Domain of this particular piece of property . Do we have a Strong Enough supervisor as we had formally at northeast in chinatown, can we get that kind of leg work going . I hope so, because this kind of timeline that they are trying to run over and over, im not too much in favor of. Thank you, mark. Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to make Public Comment on this item . Being none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner low. We have shared the same goal with the developer is to build open space and provide new open space opportunities for what is the border of chinatown and the financial district, which
Other agreements on the lien of the property. In this particular case, i would be hoping that the recreation and Park Department in light of this going on can we yes, sir can we as a body of people here in San Francisco county, citizenry, can we try to Eminent Domain of this particular piece of property . Do we have a Strong Enough supervisor as we had formally at northeast in chinatown, can we get that kind of leg work going . I hope so, because this kind of timeline that they are trying to run over and over, im not too much in favor of. Thank you, mark. Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to make Public Comment on this item . Being none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner low. We have shared the same goal with the developer is to build open space and provide new open space opportunities for what is the border of chinatown and the financial district, which is the densest area in the united states. So we do have the same goal. We just have to get to that finish line. I u
I was not the chairman when i came up and it is not permanent work. When i became chairman of h. R. Staffing were taken to make sure be redoing more collaborative vacation in psp like are you still advance it not . It is not within right now. It is in part in the spirit it is completely positive and we have been working with Stakeholder Community through an Advisory Panel on the issue of the single window and imports. We are running a pilot that will come out in a few and we are trying to get it right. We are having this exact collaborations. Okay, my time is out. Ive got one other question, but i will submit the question to you in writing. I thank you can yield back. A chair now recognizes the gentleman said from texas for five minutes. I think the chair. A special welcome to a former house colleague. Good to see you again. I want to talk about nanotechnology. As in 1985 graduate of Rice University in houston, texas we are proud that two of our professors robert crowe and Richard Smal
Priority of the agency now. I have one more question. You recently stated that the sole basis for recommendation to the ban of most widely used chemicals was cumulative Risk Assessment which found the majority of Citizens Advisory Panel recommendation which found the majority of risk associated with chemicals was from another chemical, dehp. Can you explain concerns for using cumulative Risk Assessment as a basis for such regulatory determination . Thank you. The chap and the proposed rule is of great concern to me has been of concern to me since the chap issued its report because i believe the chap report should have been a public should have been subject to public peer review at that point. From that point onto me the system and whole process has been flawed. The cumulative Risk Assessment youre talking about is one of my concerns in that the process thats used, thats not well accepted in the Scientific Community, cumulative Risk Assessment, so i think that goes to the process and va
Rule. All the Public Comment except one was against that. But i think what im hearing is you move forward with a little bit more of a heavy hand than what you would represent to us. And you say you want to be engaging the industry and you want to be collaborative, but what i the feedback im getting, those are your words but your actions are much more heavyhanded. That youve determined what you want as the outcome. Thereby, youre going to let people think theyre participating, but in the end youre the rule maker and youre going to get your way. So do you feel like that is a collaborative atmosphere in trying to work with the industry and how would you respond to those type of comments made about the way you all are approaching rule making . Is that for me . Yes, sir. Youre the chairman. And is that question specific to the 1110 rule or more general . It is specifically to 1110, but in general when it comes to dealing with industry. Sure. So ill address both. The 1110 rule is in indefini