Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to our discussion of health scotts new book, connectedness and contagion. Here it is. If you didnt notice, we have copies for sale. Its my pleasure to remind that youre welcome to buy a copy and how will be available to autograph them. Here we are in aei stylish new Conference Center to discuss a very old problem, namely how best to survive panics of which there have been many across the centuries and survive fear and distrust when financial actors try to withdraw to protect themselves, a rational strategy for each but as we all know not when they all do it at the same time. Highly interested historically but much more pressing when we consider as his book does in detail and what should we do in the next panic which would surely arrive sooner or later. Two centuries ago David Ricardo observed a general panic may seize the country when everyone becomes desirous of treasury metals, banks have no security on any system, that is to say the private banks on th
Thwaite. He was editorinchief of the economist magazine, which is where i first got to know him. I am pleased to have him back at this table. Welcome. Explain this to us. Long beenbritish have in the state of angst about europe. Cameron decided to offer them a referendum. Huge debates about whether he should have done that. But that is the starting point. The british have not voted this since the 1970s. I think there was a lot of pressure on cameron to give them a chance to have another say on this. It has been building and bigley building, particularly in the conservative party. Within the conservative party, the easiest way to think about europe is it is roughly a can to being akin to being prolife in the republican party. If you want to be selected, being skeptical about europe is part of being elected. Camerons deal has always been he would go to europe and come back with improvements in the relationship. Charlie he negotiated with . John Angela Merkel efron saw francois hollande.
Hes editor in chief to the economist magazine where i first know him. Which i am pleased to have him back here. Morning. So, explain this to us. British have long been of angst about europe. Cameron decided to offer them a referendum. Debate about where he that. Have done i think there was a lot of pressure on cameron to give them to have another say on this. Its been building and building theparticularly within conservative party. David cameron prime minster and head of the conservative party. Within the conservative party, the easiest way to think about is akin to being prolife in the republican party. Cameron his deal has been to go to europe and he would come back the improvements in relationship. He negotiated with angel markell. He brought back a package, brought that back to parliament and said well have a referendum whether to stay or go. In. Nt to stay stop right there. Unions what the european is and whats the advantage to being a member of the european member . Of being aant
Bloomberg from 2006 22014, he was editor in chief of the economist magazine, which is where i first got to know him. I am pleased to have him back at this table. Welcome. John i am delighted to be associated with any erosion of. Of democracy. Charlie explain this to us. john the british have long been in the state of angst about europe. Cameron decided to offer them a referendum. Huge debates about whether he should have done that. That is the starting the british point. Have not voted this since the 1970s. I think there was a lot of pressure on cameron to give them a chance to have another say on this. It has been building and building, particularly within the conservative party. David cameron and the conservative party. Within the conservative party, the easiest way to think about europe is it is roughly akin to being prolife in the republican party. If you want to be selected as a tory being skeptical about , europe is part of being elected. Anyway camerons deal has always , been he
I am pleased to have him back at this table. Welcome. Explain this to us. John the british have long been in the state of angst about europe. Cameron decided to offer them a referendum. Huge debates about whether he should have done that. But that is the starting point. The british have not voted this since the 1970s. I think there was a lot of pressure on cameron to give them a chance to have another say on this. It has been building and building, particularly in the conservative party. Within the conservative party, the easiest way to think about europe is it is roughly akin to being prolife in the republican party. If you want to be elected, being skeptical about europe is part of being elected. Camerons deal has always been he would go to europe and come back with improvements in the relationship. Charlie he negotiated with . John Angela Merkel and francois hollande. He brought the package back to parliament and said we will have a referendum on whether to stay or go. I will offer