Podcasts. Announcer if you enjoyed this weeks q a interview, here are some other programs you might like. Former ambassador Peter Galbraith on his book. Former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld talks about his memoir. And john negroponte, interviewed while still working as National Intelligence director to talks about iraq, vietnam, and gathering. Telligence you can watch these programs as well as others any time at cspan. Org. During question time this past week, british Prime Minister David Cameron was asked about u. K. Relations with russia and the syrian refugee crisis. He also spoke about the uks upcoming referendum about whether to remain in the European Union. This is 40 minutes. Mr. Speaker order. Questions to the Prime Minister. David cameron thank you, mr. Speaker. I know the whole house was to will wish to join me in congratulating Leicester City on winning the premier league title. Having been 5,000 to 1 outsiders at the start of the season, they have shown superb ability,
Spring. Live coverage on cspan2. This is expected to get started in just a couple of moments. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] we are live at the Hudson Institute for discussion on effective preparedness, response and recovery from biological and chemical threats. At a long discussion includes the Blue Ribbon Study Panel Blue Ribbon Study Panel on biodefense but among those you will hear from former connecticut senator Joe Lieberman secretary tom ridge, former senator tom daschle and former hhs secretary Donna Shalala. This is expected to start momentarily. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] again we are live at the Hudson Institute this morning waiting for the start of the discussion on biodefense but it should get unde
Partners and how their actions decisions, capabilities might play in our assistance of their defense or how it may limit our ability, depending on what choices they have to make. Nato, for instance has a very detailed bmd plan for the intercept of missiles for nato territory and europe. What are other elements that the Nato Alliance can bring to bear fence an antagonist. They are a military alliance after all. They are not the eu. What sort of connections and relations with the eu, the economic deciders of europe need to be engendered in order to come up with an effective response. In the interleaving of these capabilities do they fall under the nato command structure or some other entity. The eu council of governments, unclear. Earlier we were talking about exchanging information. Frank mentioned that. How do you coordinate this with owe allies and partners. Some of us can be very sensitive. But some of it needs to be planned and thought of ahead of time. Do we need to extend the conc
Accidental hazard material and chemical terrorist attack is the necessity of working with federal, state and local Law Enforcement agencies to preserve evidence and maintain seen security for the criminal investigation. A little bit more complex situation might involve an Infectious Disease such as smallpox and in that event, the Public Health community would play a larger role in working with us to manage that incident. It would be important to track down who was exposed to the disease and who came in contact with these patients in this type of event this is where you see symptoms they not be present or may not arise immediately, but in the doing days. Although each of these agents are chemical involved, might have their own intricacies. There are some commonalities within response to a chemical or biological attack. Firstly Accurate Information is one of the most aspect of that. One of the goals of a terrorist attack is to cause public panic. It is important Accurate Information abou
Earlier, but is there anything, where are the discussions about i understand that the vote is going on right now. We will have a yes vote or a no vote. You doing that until after the vote . I will have more to say about this after the vote. We will see. A couple of followups. First on the Debbie Wassermann schultz. Does the president have complete confidence in Debbie Wassermann schultz . I ran through the track record. Does he have confidence . Based on the strong track record of leadership, the president has strong confidence in her ability to lead the organization. Okay and back to the campaign operation, whatever you want to call it against isis. Why does the president never use the word war when describing this. We had back and forth here and you eventually used it. We havent heard him say this is a war. Does he consider it a war . Yes, based on the position that i articulated. The United States in the same way that we are at war with al qaeda and the affiliates around the globe w