Undercut the argument for the necessity to pass this bill in the first place. It is a rational thing for all companies to do is to do the kinds of things this bill requires. You dont need to pass the bill. Not passing and is not going to have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Discrimination is not going to be having substantial effect on your state congress. Companies are going to be taking steps to get rid of it, anyway. I think there are going to be situations where taking Sexual Orientation into account is going to make sense. It may not be common and it may not be something that involves what most companies do this is another problem with passing onesizefitsall federal legislation. It may be that people who make airplanes have no reason to consider Sexual Orientation. The people who are in the caregiving business might want to consider Sexual Orientation. It just depends. There are thousands of businesses out there. They are all different. I dont think we should be passi
O capitol hill this week for orientation training sessions fo the start in january the Senate Returns a three pin id. A continue debate on a u. S. Strict court judge for puerto rico. Watch live coverage of the house on cspan, the senate on cspan2. You can also want on a fe video out cspan now, or online at cspan. Org. Next a a Panel Discussion hosted by the Federalist Society on to mix up in court cases that focus on use of affirmative action and of the race conscious admissions policies at colleges and universities. Welcome to the search with it. My name is that were excited to host a discussion phase or arguments. We have a great panel with us today. Ill keep interest briefed as we get to the discussion going. You can you there for my files online. Amanda shanor is a universe of pennsylvania what the school of business where scholarship focuses on administrator slavitt just particular expertise in a First Amendment and work on the master cake shop case. Devon westhill is president ia
Data shows different loan approval race for different groups of consumers. Some of these result mace be due to discrimination and other mace not be. Its impossible to tell which is which from the statistics aaloan. You should disparty impact it doesnt matter. All statistical differences are considered by themselves discrimination. To be clear, none of us have a tolerance for intentional discrimination. If theres intentional discrimination, we must prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law. The Justice Departments use of disparty impact tries to fight one injustice with another. On a more practical level, disparty impact will make it difficult if not impossible for lenders to make rational economic decisions about risk. Lenders will feel pressure to weaken their current standards to keep their statistics in line with whatever the Justice Department bureaucrats consider nondiscriminatory. We have seen this discriminatory what discriminatory lending can do to our economy. Its reckless
She reached out to me to read it, to read a draft. And since i was trying to build dress and providing feedback, found the draft fresh. I found that, you know, i certainly pushed back in some areas. I think i did. That would be contested, but what was most attractive to me was, it is just about the future of race. Often we look backward in history. It is important, but focusing on the future. Fast forward to today. We have been thinking a lot about the new center, thinking about home again and reinvigorating our core strength, what makes us different. What are we uniquely situated to do . You know, we have relationships with the 11,000 black elected officials in the country. So certainly that is one thing we are situated to do. Thank you, david. Yonhap males of colored. We had the commission in 2005 and six. The joint center and really spearheading that. That along with the efforts of many others contributed to the my brothers Keepers Initiative that the president just announced. But P
The American People are tired of the obvious bias in the national media. Thats where the sense of a rigged election goes here. Our new poll numbers show a Larger National lead for Hillary Clinton but what about in the handful of swing states that will decide the election . Lets get right to the political team. Nbcs Hallie Jackson and Kelly Odonnell along with msnbc chief Legal Correspondent ari melber. Thank you all for being here. Hallie, i want to start with you. We spent yesterday trying to sort through all of these comments from donald trump and his surrogates and mike pence. Theyre not on the same page. Ive been talking to republicans who say, theyre concerned about the fact hes trying to set up this as a rigged election. Any sense theyll get on the same page today. A lot of the concern echoed in my conversations, kristen. I think people, especially in the republican side, members of the elected officials, people who support these folks say this is dangerous. What donald trump say