Various channels, as of last night there was still not an agreement acceptance on the deal on the table that had been devoted to an agreed to previously. That is why we are here today say we have no deal. We are ready, we were ready last night, we were ready two weeks ago. That is the latest i have heard directly from them. Im sorry, to, you are saying that the deal that you presented today has been available since the last hearing . That is what you are saying . And that is something that you emailed to them, or how did that get communicated to united to save the mission . Weve got a lot of different folks operating the mission. Its a challenging environment. Challenging project sponsors. Challenging neighborhood groups. It is a very sensitive neighborhood. Up and until two weeks ago, there was lots of communication back and forth between larissa, her folks on the project sponsor. That communication was not going anywhere. It did not result in the acceptance of the agreement. In the l
Dont have time come on. Im still on the phone sorry. Come on come on i dont have time for this sorry im on the phone. I will end this call ive got to work. I could restart now please i dont have time. Oh hello hello and welcome to in good shape you know stress is not good for you its not good for your health but there are some expert who claims that stress might be good and that might even be healthy and this is back and i will meet him here really i dont need to know. And kind of like. Often. Dont think the threat is always negative it can have you have a happy life. Do you know this problem in your practice where more than 30 patients waiting for you and you have to do this show presentation and in the evening this is big god i have to attend no you dont have those problems but you certainly have your own problems and you could use more than 24 hours every day but what does solve the problem for. The Dance Teacher every day begins with a warm up breakfast and emails so tiny a slate.
In the last two weeks i have been conversations not directly between myself or the project sponsor, but there have been conversations were once again the deal was put in front of them, we are ready to go. We will sign it this morning, and our understanding is no. Thank you. I still dont understand it, because i took what we said here as a direct invitation for those parties who were present in the room to talk to each other. I have a lineal way of thinking about that. That was the people i thought i was talking to and that didnt happen. So i dont know what to say. I dont have any comment anymore on that matter. Thank you. There is a motion on the table. I will say, my strong directive was to go back and work with the community. I expected there to be that communication, different from the last time. We heard this, the last few times we have heard this, i have not received a lot of communication from Community Folks nor do i see lots of Community Folks here today. You know, obviously th
Im sorry, to, you are saying that the deal that you presented today has been available since the last hearing . That is what you are saying . And that is something that you emailed to them, or how did that get communicated to united to save the mission . Weve got a lot of different folks operating the mission. Its a challenging environment. Challenging project sponsors. Challenging neighborhood groups. It is a very sensitive neighborhood. Up and until two weeks ago, there was lots of communication back and forth between larissa, her folks on the project sponsor. That communication was not going anywhere. It did not result in the acceptance of the agreement. In the last two weeks i have been conversations not directly between myself or the project sponsor, but there have been conversations were once again the deal was put in front of them, we are ready to go. We will sign it this morning, and our understanding is no. Thank you. I still dont understand it, because i took what we said her
Policy in determining and no one on the panel raise their hand. I just wanted to note that for the record. I wanted to ask a question from professor, is the United States violating or violated human rights agreements of the United Nations in the separation policy . Yes. International law is clear that family unity should be prioritized. So we as members of the United Nations to International Human rights agreement saying very clearly that family separation is a violation of International Human rights and then we pursue a pile see that violates human rights. Mr. Chair, i was looking, how do we get to this point where we take children out of mothers and fathers arms and it didnt back, family separation and the way we have seen it where we take children away from their parents without due process. I began last year undersecretary kirstjen nielsen. I had to dig for the print but where did the start within the administration that she implement it. We found a memo. It dates back to april 23