whenever they a wanted to. they re trying to create a bifurcation of donald trump s stuck in new york, and i m looking like a statesman trying to solve middle east paris. e peace. it s not going to work. he mentioned how dangerous it was. notice the word dangerous will: yes. reckless. pete: to talk about the fact, ecless and dangerous that if you talk about the trial being rigged will: yes. pete: which is a signal for what? signal for misinformation. will: absolutely. pete: you ve without to censor that, shut that down. rachel: and they did that with january 6th, around the electio- pete: correct. is lawfare was supposed to be their curveball. we re going to lock him up. that was how it hasn t worked. he s raising more money, he s going up in the polls. so what a do they do thousand? and elon musk has gotten underneath their censorship machine, because you can actually will: pete, i saw the same thing, and i heard the same language. reckless and irresponsible and dangerous. t
three of whom were democrats, and two-thirds of them said, no. in fact, to the extent of i would vote forton the trump. yesterday we had that for donald trump. here s what hay had to say. i think western be entitled to the free comes we ve always had. there s also national security that s top of mind for me, there s the economy, there are so many issues that we need answers on. and and and as a voter, i would like to hear from all of the potential candidates on where they stand on all of those issues. i just really believe that right now we need to focus on the economy and our borders. i mean, we re destroying our country by what s happening on the southern border, and we have to the really take a look at that and fix it. i would vote against joe biden based on what he s done with our children in education and also the censorship machine. i m a soviet immigrant. i came here when i was 6, and i know what it s like to have your free speech stifled. seeing how people who were not
view is the one that i would have expected this morning many that even though you are the you are kiss satisfied with joe biden and you said every one of your friends are dissatisfied with joe biden, you will stick with him in a general election against a republican. i m more surprised to the hear from natalia and frank that you d be willing to leave joe biden, not just willing, but you re interested, looks like you re going to, and,-and-a-halfal la, you would move having not voted for him before to donald trump. i m hoping that it won t come to that. i think he s a terrible candidate. he duded this country and created divided this country, but i would vote against joe biden based on what he s done with our children and education and also the censorship machine. i am a soviet emigrant, i came here when i was 6, and i know what it s like to have your free speech stifled. and under the biden administration we have stifled free speech and created a very oppressive environment that rem
agentsed to comb through social media posts year round. as taieb reports, the ubiquity of the twenty sixteen russianine interference story as a statedrr pretext for building outhine the censorship machine can t be overstated. its analogous to how september 11th inspired the expansion ofyt the security state through hundreds of meetings, phone calls and emails, twitter was getting a constant stream of censorship requests from multiple individuals at the fbom i ,the dhs, state government officials, even government contractors. contractor as taibbi concludes, quote, whats most people think of as the deep state is reallyrealy a tangled collabo creation of state agencies, private contractors, and sometimes a state funded ngos.e ngo the lines become so blurred as to be meaningless. in other words,irecti the washington swamp was constantly directing big tech to censor speech.
dozens of agents to comb through social media posts year round. the ubiquity of the 2016 russian interference story as stated pretext for building out the censorship machine can t be overstated to. it s analogous to how september 11th inspired the expansion of the security state through hundreds of meetings, phone calls, and emails, twitter was getting a constant stream of censorship requests from multiple individuals at the fbi, the dhs, state government officials, even government contractors two as he concludes, what most people think of as the deep state is really a tangled collaboration of state agencies, private contractors, and a sometimes state funded ngos, the lines become so blurred as to be meaningless. in other words, the washington swamp was constantly directing big tech to censor speech they