the results of this election in 2010? yeah, because it s going to be a blowout. it s not going to be close enough to question. so i m an amateur historian. there was one party that enslaved a race that started the civil war, that put another race in internment camps. that censor s beach that raids homes, plants, evidence and traps, censor speech, accuses other people of being cockroaches. now, i could call the democrats, but i won t because i choose to show a little bit more restraint than that. and i commend myself for showing such restraint. i m looking forward to seeing what the democrats are going to accuse us of next. so manhattan s not under water. al gore. blacks are not back in chains. joe biden we re still going to have voting. barack obama and we re not going to be next year, james . so it s like the boy cried wolf and then he cried lion. and then he cried dinosaur. and then he cried loch ness monster. what is worse than being an
what looks to be a record turnout of american patriots next tuesday in a time of economic and foreign policy distress. joining us now s kentucky senator rand paul. good to see you tonight senator. given what we learned this week, is there any greater threat to democracy than one political party working with the big tech in our intel apparatus to come after american speech? for all the talk of democracy, it seems to me that they re undermining the very basic principles of our constitutional republic. freedom of speech was listed in the first amendment because it was one of the most important rights that our founders thought should be protected. but having the government collude with big tote to censor speech is something that goes against every grain of everything that anyone is ever spoken about as far as freedom of speech. so when we get back in session, and introduced legislation that will forbid the government from
colluding private companies to censor speech. this is a tricky situation because many people believe that the first amendment doesn t allow us to regulate the speech of private companies. but without question, we can regulate the government, and we can prevent the government from colluding with private tack on speech. but i think we should also preclude them and prohibit them from gathering up data. we can t really tell people on the internet they can collect our data for sails and for marketing. but we can tell the government they can collect that data because i don t want the government profiling every citizen. that goes against everything we all believe in as far as the foundation of our constitutional republic. laura: we know some of it that china gathers data on a minute-by-minute basis on its citizens to create these social credit system profiles of each individual. they don t let you go on a certain transportation system if
the government from colluding with private companies to censor speech. now, thia trs is aicky tricky sn because many people believe that the first amendment doesn t allow us to regulate the speech of privatpeeche companies. but without question, we can regulate the government and we can prevent and forbid the government from colluding with private attack on speech. sho but i think we should also preclude them and prohibit them from gathering up our data so we can t really tell peopleca on the internet if they can t collect our data for sales t we can and for marketing. but we can tell the government they can t collect that data becaushat datae i don t want the government profiling every citizen that goes against everything that we all believers in. as far as the foundation of our constitutional republic. we know, senator , thatf it china gathers data on a minute by minute basis on its citizens to create these social credit system profiles of each individual. they don t let you go on
sean: now you are getting into a really important part of all this, either you agree with everything the professor is saying, or you are transphobic, one, two, you re putting people s lives at risk. you are that would cause threats to their lives, or three, that would cause them to have a risk of suicide. that is patently unfair if you are asking an honest question about how do you define a man, how do you define a woman, and is it your contention that biologically born men can have children, that would be a fair question, and if you don t give the right answer, then you get labeled it transphobic, you get the transphobic tattoo, you know, literally etched into your forehead. and what they use that as an excuse for, sean, the left, that is, is to censor speech, and you can see that s where this witness was going today, oh my goodness, your questions can lead to violence. therefore you shouldn t be asking them. i mean, that was the import of what she said to me, you shouldn t be a