pounced on them. thinking that it s cold, calculated, and turned over his phone during the hours of the group, there was conscious concealing the crime. i think he went there knowing what he was looking for and had been building this up for several weeks. molly: if the suspect is killer, innocent until proven guilty, he had ostensibly studied crimnology, and why would he have made so many mistakes, and people who watch crime dramatic, stalking the weeks before, the cell phone ping, using the vehicle that you own. obviously he wasn t as smart as you thought he was, leaving the sheath with the blood on it and giving to police the dna. he s fascinated with crime and put out survey at one point asking what was emotional for people about a crime and
allow you to commit the perfect crime. the forensic and behavioral evidence was there, and they discovered it. the returning what seems to be i don t know if it was returning to the scene or staying in the area, the cell phone ping that gary tuchman talked about several hours after the murders were committed. what do you make of that? well, looking at that in connection with some of the other things that have surfaced on this case, originally you could look at it and say, it s naivety, it s lack of experience. and it could be some of that. but i also think it s a sense of arrogance. and i also think it could be a sense of, i m smarter than the police and they re never going to be able to tie me to the case. and that will remain to be seen based on his behavior in the courtroom. but i do think that arrogance is really bleeding through in a variety of the photographs that we ve seen and in the videos that we ve seen on him.
from which they were able to extract dna. then you have the information from the cameras and then you have the information from the cell towers that paint on its phone. these were mistakes that are not consistent with somebody that is smarter than everybody else and knows more than anybody else. so i think it puts into perspective, for me, that just because you are studying for a ph.d. in criminology does not allow you to commit the perfect crime. there are forensic and behavioral evidence there and they discovered it. the return, what seems to be returning to the scene or staying in the area, the cell phone ping that gary tuchman talked about several hours after the murders were committed, what do you make of that? well, looking at that in connection with some of the other things that have surfaced
investigation especially with another country especially about an adult so tie it all up in that. but get back to your question looks leak we walked off the set of the study prying if he s 80 miles away in a sporting goods store. the problem is when he goes off the grid totally, no communications, the cell phone ping, the credit start stops moving you have to wonder if he walked way under his own volition did something happen to him, is he okay, where is he, why is he off the grid. the parents obviously worried their son, they want to know where he is. there s the concern you raise allison. has there been frustration about the lack of information? absolutely. they re worried sick as any parent would be worry if i had they child had gone missing. they say it s out of character for him because he had been communicating every single day checking in saying i m doing
her. they have been in contact with her and then they when all this started, they were updating us and, no, we haven t actually spoken with her. and have they given any updates i know the cell phone ping, that s a way you can sometimes track where someone is, has their phone pinged off a tower recently. anything on that? we have heard nothing. just that one time. i spoke with the embassy this morning. he can t provide any updates. the embassy. and we kind of feel left in the dark. the addition of the french prosecutor story is something that was new yesterday. i just challenge that french prosecutor. he doesn t know our son. and there was statements made in his statement that, you know, i