ask next. the most glaring question is why is this guy still in office? you know, everybody is saying why isn t he charged yet? i think we have the answer from these transcripts. it s one thing to have an alleged video of him smoking crack, but when you look at these transcripts, they were building a case. and the transcripts say that they not only intercepted 59 cell phone conversations for several months, but they had gps monitoring, cell phone pings to find out where the vehicles and the cell phones actually were. and they used a public monitoring system that they have in canada to be able to view vehicles as they drive around. how much more, carol, do they allegedly have on the mayor? and how much more do they really need before they file charges against him? well, they want to be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt at least in american standards that they can convict him of any crimes that he is charged with. and sometimes that takes time. jean casarez, thank you s
victims, men, women and children and hear from those who survived. it is the first 360-degree view of terrorism. november 26, 2008, an organization determined to surpass al qaeda as the world s most feared terrorist group sent ten gunmen to mumbai, india s biggest city. their mission was to kill and keep on killing. to stage a spectacle so terrifying that the world could no longer ignore lashkar-e-taiba, the army of the righteous. indian intelligence intercepted the terrorists cell phone conversations with their commanders in pakistan.
henry said, if left up to me, cell phone calls would be banned from restaurants so they should be surely banned on airplanes. at least lisa says, can you imagine if you were on a long flight and wanted to sleep. imagine hearing about a love life going downhill. finally, how i d love to be stuck in a contained space with 100 cell phone conversations going on said no one in their right mind ever. the plane is so loud. some people made that point. so everybody would be shouting. absolutely. positively. texting is fine. you can communicate without annoying everybody else. i agree 100%. you do? it is uncomfortable. you are smooched together as it is. it would be probably more trouble than it is worth but if they had a five-minute talking window at the beginning before you fall asleep, everybody can talk but yeah, whatever. no. we ll see what happens. but people tend to lose their manners. they want to make their call and it becomes the most important thing.
victims, men, women and children and hear from those who survived. it is the first 360-degree view of terrorism. november 26, 2008, an organization determined to surpass al qaeda as the world s most feared terrorist group sent ten gunmen to mumbai, india s biggest city. their mission was to kill and keep on killing. to stage a spectacle so terrifying that the world could no longer ignore lashkar-e-taiba, the army of the righteous. indian intelligence intercepted the terrorists cell phone conversations with their commanders in pakistan.
fcc s plan two thumbs up. mean there are pros here. i m open to the cons. commercial airline pilot patrick smith, and paul headson, president of flyersrights.org. paul, let me begin with you. you re the closest person we can find who doesn t actually entirely despise this idea. so tell me, someone who has been on five planes this week, why this idea may not be entirely insane. well, of course, the primary concern is safety. assuming that is satisfied, the next concern is privacy. everyone has been disturbed by other people s cell phone conversations. however, on long-haul flights, especially, people may need or very much want to be able to have a phone conversation. there could be an old-fashioned phone booth or privacy in the back of the aircraft. but the idea of having