he tried to stab me and i tried to grab the knife. it cut me. he cut me. he was trying to chop me up. he tried to do everything to me. police have not said how the suspect killed lueck and we don t yet know why she met him at the park. we have a criminal and trial defense attorney. they re still married. but it s fascinating when you look at this case from a legal standpoint how they put this thing together. it s really electronics, electronic base. yeah, it s interesting. the police rely on electronic evidence, phone record, cell data, gps technology, social media connections. that s how they linked this victim with this defendant. i want to play this sound
is breaking up. what s that about? big companies, people talked about fang, facebook, apple, amazon, netflix, google. now as the companies are under more scrutiny from drch.c., thee talking about how different their working models are. apple, back from the consumer electronics show with apple saying we don t take your cell data, which is a direct poke in the eye at facebook. now investors and washington are starting to think of these stocks differently rather than big tech or fang, we re talking about individual companies as we look ahead to the 2020 election. facebook has already gotten the washington and media treatment. look for youtube and twitter to get more scrutiny heading into the next election
i think there has to be two things. i think we have to take responsibility for what we sign up for and be careful and mindful. but i do think we have to level the playing field with some laws. you know, 100 years ago when photography was invented, it created new threats to privacy, and ultimately the law changed. interestingly, chris, right now the supreme court has taken some cases that have demonstrated they re now beginning to look at whether the law has to change again. the carpenter case with the police, about their needing a warrant to get your cell data. exactly, because what the court s now saying is, you know, it s not just about keeping your data hidden. it s about who controls the data after it s been collected. i think that s an important step forward. with opportunity comes responsibility. the book is exploding data, reclaiming our cybersecurity in the digital age. secretary chertoff, thank you. while we are in hand shake mode, please promise to come back and hel
and ultimately the law changed. interestingly, chris, right now the supreme court has taken some cases that have demonstrated they re now beginning to look at whether the law has to change again. the carpenter case with the police, about their needing a warrant to get your cell data. exactly, because what the court s now saying is, you know, it s not just about keeping your data hidden. it s about who controls the data after it s been collected. i think that s an important step forward. with opportunity comes responsibility. the book is exploding data, reclaiming our cybersecurity in the digital age. secretary chertoff, thank you. please promise to come back and help us understand what happens at the summit. appreciate it. so another war to keep your eye on is the escalating non-trade war with china because we re told it s not a trade war. however, the u.s. government just followed through on president trump s threat, $200 billion more in tariffs against china. so now what ha
and it was too heavy, so it just landed on my arm. okay, makes sense, okay. that makes sense. all right. then the defense went after the cell phone data. what do you have? cell data. they brought in their own expert saying that these cell phone towers and these pings are not reliable. and christina s dna in the trunk? gore pointed out enrique s camara and christina s toyota were processed at the same police garage. this is a one bay one garage and you have all the cars coming in and out. nobody needs to tell you this, this is how cross-contamination occurs. the evidence is not there beyond a reasonable doubt. and i would ask for your verdict of not guilty. enrique did not testify. and the jury got the case. deliberations dragged on for two days. and then a verdict. we, the jury, find the defendant guilty of aggravated kidnapping as charged in the