to be killed by a fellow american and gun than you are by a jihadi terrorist. i mean, if you want to do something about terrorism in this country, there s an easy way to do it. through the campaign, president trump suggested he contemplated this idea, makes no sense people are on the no fly list allowed to buy semi automatic weapons, remains the case. a bill in congress you recall after the orlando attack, but they failed. but that s a common sense measure that would make a difference. i have a time con stranstrai i want to get this in. nobody knows al qaeda or isis like you. you interviewed osama bin laden. you, peter bergen toured that compound, the only western journalist to get access before they raezed it.
let s not play a semantic ban, that s what it is, given he s singled out seven countries that have been hotbeds of terror activity. i hope he does defeat isis but i worry not only about the discriminatory implications of a religion test, the action may make us feel more safe while actually making us less so. i can only imagine the positive way at that this agreement will be greeted by al qaeda and isis, as both seek to prepare the war with the west as based on faith. he seems to have taken that bait. it may sound appealing when the president says he acting to keep out radical islamic terrorists but that s not necessarily the kase. none of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 came from any of the affected nations. they came largely from saudi arabia and from the united arab
emirates, egypt and lebanon. also missing from the list, pakistan, birthplace of the san bernardino attack killer where 14 were killed in the united states. she entered the united states on a fiancee visa. the cato institute determined the chance of getting killed by a terrorist attack caused by a refugee is 1.36 billion a year. you re three time more likely to be killed by a fellow american with a gun and that a jihady terrorists. and what about the iraqis who have worked with the united states in the war against terror? how can we leave them behind? i m mindful that syrian refugees face a hobson s choice of siding with bashar al assad or isis. instead, many fleed.
they either had to stick around with bashar al assad or isis. we re no longer giving them refuge. does that not trouble you? we know in the paris attacks that some of the people involved in those attacks were from the refugees out of syria. so there s just a real inability. there s no data to research, we don t know who they are. they could give doinlt papers. don t know if they re accurate or not. trump is saying before we accept these people coming from a country rakd with civil war, let s wait a minute and create a better vetting system. most of the things on the border are temporary ban. he said he would do this on the campaign. i don t think he is aennti-musl. i think he loves the muslim world, i think he is going to reach out to them and i think he has done business in most of those countries. give me the final word to say
park park, does that not trouble you? well, we know in the paris attacks that some of the people involved in those attacks were from the refugees out of syria. and so there prrk how do we vet there could be certain identity papers. we don t know if they re accurate osht. about so trump is saying let s create a better vetting system. most of the countries in the executive order he s doing are a temporary ban. i think it s just as matter of time. he said he was going to do this in the campaign. i don t think he s anti-muslim. i think he loves the muslim world. i think he s going to reach out to them and i think he s done business in muslim countries. give me the final word to say that i m troubled by the idea that in some cave isis is