the united states. now, as bad as the bill clinton $500,000 speech was for a russian bank, this is 290 times as much money. so you have to say to yourself, oh, gosh, why would bill and hillary go through with the deal that might involve $145 million? well, i m going to be old fashioned here, sean. i know it s a shock. [laughter] follow the money. they wanted the money. this is about corruption. hillary, from the time she made money illegally, on cattle future, for her entire career has thought she could get away with this stuff. it s only as it begins to unravel now that we begin to realize this is truly horrifying. you have two attorneys general of the united states. you have the director of the fbi, mr. mueller. you have a local attorney who becomes the deputy who then the attorney general who then brings in mueller. you have a level of corruption that s unimaginable. and let me say, quoting
70s. executive at tyson foods. diane blair was close. jim blair was the one who helped hillary clinton make extraordinary profit with cattle future. we re going way back. she invested $10,000 and came away with $100,000 in a very few months. this reremain close. diane blair died in the year 2000. her husband gave her papers to the university of arkansas. the washington free beacon went and looked at the papers. i think what we are seeing now is in the reaction of this we are going to get a bead on how far you can go back in mrs. clinton s past as a campaign issue in 2016. will be in. you know, a.b., did secretary clinton know these notes were being taken? that s what i don t get, like if my friends did that to me that s what i wondered as well. what started in faith yet should stay in fayetteville.
70s. executive at tyson foods. diane blair was close. jim blair was the one who helped hillary clinton make extraordinary profit with cattle future. we re going way back. she invested $10,000 and came away with $100,000 in a very few months. this reremain close. diane blair died in the year 2000. her husband gave her papers to the university of arkansas. the washington free beacon went and looked at the papers. i think what we are seeing now is in the reaction of this we are going to get a bead on how far you can go back in mrs. clinton s past as a campaign issue in 2016. will be in. you know, a.b., did secretary clinton know these notes were being taken? that s what i don t get, like if my friends did that to me that s what i wondered as well. what started in faith yet should stay in fayetteville. they were detailed and there
looking at becomes law, wouldn t have any affect on the things we re talking about with goldman? well, look, the things with goldman, that was a contract between two consenting individuals, the s.e.c. of course is charging that there were some shenanigans with how it was represented, you know, on one side to the other. that aside, that s a customized contract, could that have been standardized and traded on the exchange? no. could it have been cleared through a clearinghouse, maybe. one of the president s advisers this week told me, yes, maybe they could figure out how to clear something like that out of a clearinghouse of so it would be more transparent. in terms of having that become a standard contract like cattle futures, some of these exotic instruments will never be able to be traded like cattle future. one cattle future is similar to another. one oil future is similar to another. you re going to be back with many we in a little while. we re going to have a broad discussion o