the purpose, fired a shot, and then vanished again into thin air leaving behind no trace of himself, his rifle, his bullet or any other sign of existence. there were two groups of people. there s one group that will look at an extraordinary coincidence, a cataclysmic circumstance and say, yes, that s the way the world works. for another group, that is quite insettling. they don t want to believe that something to random with occurred. can you believe that you could step off the curb someday and be killed by an oncoming car? nobody believes in that kind of stuff for themselves but it happens. for them, oddly, the notion of a conspiracy is more comforting than the absence of it. if there s a conspiracy, at
oldest profession, the second business was you can buy passportses stolen in bank clgk. you take those and put them together, this guy is living in iran. there s a reason to assume, at least a investigation of terrorism. meeting in malaysia before 9/11 as well. the disappearance of this plane, greg, was sudden and cataclysmic. it had reached 30,000 feet and all of a sudden vanishes. and it s dumbfounding we have no record of it because we think we can record every. there s a couple of points i want to make. it creates priorities in the news. we re talking about climate change and russian politician muscle flexing. this knocks everything off because it affects everybody. it creates a hierarchy of priorities. what we know is inversely proportional to what we say being on tv. we have to keep talking about something without knowing anything. the question is who would bomb a
oldest profession, the second business was you can buy passportses stolen in bank clgk. you take those and put them together, this guy is living in iran. there s a reason to assume, at least a investigation of terrorism. meeting in malaysia before 9/11 as well. the disappearance of this plane, greg, was sudden and cataclysmic. it had reached 30,000 feet and all of a sudden vanishes. and it s dumbfounding we have no record of it because we think we can record every. there s a couple of points i want to make. it creates priorities in the news. we re talking about climate change and russian politician muscle flexing. this knocks everything off because it affects everybody. it creates a hierarchy of priorities. what we know is inversely proportional to what we say being on tv. we have to keep talking about something without knowing anything. the question is who would bomb a
historic summer of 1968. in it mr. patterson writes in part for whitney the memory was piercing, girls crowded around the tv in me do, south, black faces shouting or sobbing, newsmen barking updates that changed nothing, whitney imagined the young black boy she was tutoring in roxbury and feared she would never see him again. who could black people bleen in. the book is loss of innocence. do you have trouble selling books? you sell about 8 million books every time one comes out. my children have their needs. i often say alimony and tuition are great inspiration to your art. 1968, though, was such a cataclysmic, compelling year that in my opinion affects us still today as does the war in vietnam affects us still today. give us the root the nature of
no trace of himself, his rife, his bullet or any other sign of existence. there were two groups of people. there s one group that will look at an extraordinary coincidence, a cataclysmic circumstance and say yes, that s the way the world works. there s another group of people for whom that s quite unsettling. they don t want to believe that something so random could have occurred. can you believe that you could step off a curb someday and be killed by an oncoming car? nobody believes in that kind of possibility for themselves, but it happens. is life that fortuitous, that uncertain? and for them, oddly, the notion of a conspiracy is more comforting than the absence of