general bill barr name john durham to investigate the investigators and predicted he d find the crime of the century. durham didn t have much luck in the courts. now, four years after he started, durham s harshly critical report saying he relied on raw, unanalyzed and uncorroborated intelligence along with seriously flawed information has plunged us all back into the same old, familiar debate, the story that seemingly will never end. i m howard kurtz and this is the mediabuzz. howard: the report by special counsel john durham exploded like a neutron bomb, and the media are deeply divided over his conclusion that the fbi acted on such flimsy evidence that its investigation of possible collusion between donald trump and the kremlin never should have been launched. first among those claiming vindication, the former president. this was a coup that they were looking at. these are sick people. howard: and many of those on fox news and elsewhere joined in castigating the m
president. this was a coup that they were looking at. these are sick people. howard: and many of those on fox news and elsewhere joined in castigating the mainstream media s handling of the 300-page report. there are so many media organizations who have so much egg on their face today. i was disgusted. i was so sickened all over again by what they did to donald trump. john durham s report shows us that the same people that reckture you today about threats to democracy lecture you today the nearly destroyed it by using our intelligence agencies to target the then-republican nominee for president. howard: left-leaning outlets, the reaction was to dismiss and ridicule the durham report as what msnbc called a dud. millions and millions of dollars and nothing to show or show for it but some really bad, humiliating headlines for pro-trump newspapers. the durham investigation