climate change. the high court curbed carbon emissions at the time when scientists are sounding the alarm on the case of dploeshl warming. also today, president biden lashed out over their decision to overturn roe. he supports a filibuster carveout for congress to codify abortion rights. he said that at the nato summit in madrid, where he announced new aid for ukraine. we will discuss this a little later, first, new developments in the january 6th investigation. resources tell cnn that cassidy hutchinson, the former aide was contacted by someone in the former president s orbit to try to influence her testimony. those revelations so damming that the committee has now issued a subpoena for one of the central figures in the west wing, pat cipollone, the former top lawyer at the trump white house. cnn congressional correspondent ryan nobles. do we know who was trying to influence tuesday s testimony? reporter: we do not, alisyn. you remember the end on tuesday after hutchin
pledged executive action to combat climate change after the supreme court s decision to limit the epa s ability to regulate cash bonn emissions. the person that calls it another devastating decision that will take our country backwards, rene marsh joins us, what does this decision mean for the environment? reporter: the head of the epa just put out a statement calling the ruling quote disappointing but vowing the agency remains exited to using the full scope of epa s authority to protect communities and reduce pollution that is driving climate change. so despite this ruling coming down, the agency clearly saying that they re going to continue to look for ways as to regulate emissions from these power plants. now, the supreme court ruling, of course, today is it safer of coal power plants? it is a win for coal-producing states and a blow to biden s climate agenda. and it will make reaching his
senator cory booker to talk about cash bonn emissions. how concerned are you about that argument, a lot of people are working the oil fields in texas, a lot of folks whose livelihoods might be disrupted or ended in their current form by the transition to net zero carbon emissions. i think there has to be a just transition, as a lot of people are now saying. i think if you go to coal miners and basically say your family, my ancestors were coal miners, your family, what you have been doing for generations, helped raise your kids, carve through the earth your labor, your american dream and this country is now going to turn their back, and you by the way helped to fuel industry, light up people s lives literally and now we re going to turn our back on you. for shame. if i heard that and i was a coal mining family, i would vote for